Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

2021-03-23 Thread Aijun Wang
Hi, My consideration is that if the solution depends on the distribution protocol among the underlay nodes to accomplish the task, then PCE should follow the procedures described in RFC8231, RFC8281 etc. That is to say, in such situation, the instruction from the PCE needs only to be sent t

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

2021-03-23 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi Julien, WG, authors. Code point allocation: Is the request for all of the code points in the document? What about the not-yet-allocated code point from [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller]. This spec can't be implemented without it. WG last call: I have a few questions/issues/nits

Re: [Pce] Implementation option of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-interdomain-01.txt

2021-03-23 Thread olivier.dugeon
Hi Mike, Le 22/03/2021 à 21:03, Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) a écrit : > > Hi Olivier, > >   > > I believe what you are trying to achieve is: > > 1. Attach a Stitching Label to a Tunnel/Policy, similar to how a Binding > Label points to a Tunnel/Policy. > [OD] Yes. Exactly > > 1. > > > 2. Signal t

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

2021-03-23 Thread Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Hi Aijun Thanks you for your comments. Inline Regards Hooman From: Aijun Wang Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 3:01 AM To: 'Dhruv Dhody' ; Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action. Hi, My consideration is tha