Hi Tom,
Thanks, please see inline.
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:02 PM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for your comments. Please see my reply inline.
Respect,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tom petch
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:14 PM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Cc:
Hi Olivier,
Many thanks for your comments, please see my reply inline.
Respect,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: olivier.dug...@orange.com [mailto:olivier.dug...@orange.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 12:39 AM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org;
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your comments, please see my reply inline.
Also, the diff is attached.
Respect,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:andrew.st...@nokia.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:21 AM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extension for Native IP Network
Authors : Aijun Wang
Boris Khasanov
Hi Aijun,
Many thanks for your comments! Please see my reply inline. The diff is attached.
Respect,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Aijun Wang [mailto:wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 11:57 AM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Cc:
Hi Adrian,
Long time no see! Thanks for your valuable comments! :)
It takes few days to address them, LOL. The latest revision has updated, see
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-08.txt
Done, thanks.
—John
On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:10 AM, Dhruv Dhody
mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote:
Hi John,
This errata should be accepted. Please handle it at your convenience.
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:08 PM RFC Errata System
mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>> wrote:
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5088,
"OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6459
--
Hi Adrian,
Thanks a lot for your thorough review.
Your comment about draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller is
legitimate. Good news: it's in the RFC Editor queue
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php#draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller)
and associated code points
Hi Hari and PCE,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Cheng
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 1:10 AM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; cfils...@cisco.com;
11 matches
Mail list logo