[Pce] 2 flags in draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid

Hi WG, draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid defines 2 flags in TE-PATH-BINDING TLV - o S-Flag: This flag encodes the "Specified-BSID-only" behavior. It is used as described in Section 6.2.3 of [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy]. o I-Flag: This flag encodes the "Drop Upon

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Thanks again for your help! Cheng -Original Message- From: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:andrew.st...@nokia.com] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 2:42 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject:

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Cheng, Thanks for clarifying the text in the document. Diff content looks good to me, much clearer. Consider my comments resolved. Thanks! Andrew On 2021-03-25, 10:49 PM, "Pce on behalf of Chengli (Cheng Li)" wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your comments, please see my reply

Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp

Hi all, After discussing with Tom and the authors, we believe that a reasonable way to progress this early allocation is to postpone the allocation of the error codes. We'll proceed accordingly. Enjoy the week-end, Dhruv & Julien On 01/02/2021 11:54, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: > Hi WG, >

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, As agreed with the authors, we'll proceed with the early allocation request by leaving the error codes pending upcoming updates (i.e. request allocation for PCEP TLV and LSP object flags). This will leave you some time to find an agreement on the final wording of the error messages.

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Cheng! This is good progress, thanks. I have cut down to the points that are still open. Nothing we need to fight about  Best, Adrian >> == Questions / Issues == >> >> 3. >> >> o BT = 0: The binding value is an MPLS label carried in the format >> specified in [RFC5462] where only

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-13.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : PCEP Extension for Native IP Network Authors : Aijun Wang Boris Khasanov

Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

Hi Hooman, With my chair hat off and speaking as a WG participant. Thanks for explaining your point of view and the history. The PCEP stateful messages are currently being used for - - LSP operations (LSP instruction/reports to/from head end i.e. stateful PCE) - PCECC operations (generic

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

To all, The latest diff of BSID draft is https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07.txt=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-08.txt Sorry for using the wrong diff file. Thanks,

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, Sorry for sending the error diff. The latest diff is here https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07.txt=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-08.txt Also, Julien has

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Oh, Adrian, all, some update for comment 4, Regarding multiple TE-PATH-BINDING TLVs, we have updated the operation rules as follow. In case of multiple TE-PATH-BINDING TLVs, all existing instances of TE-PATH-BINDING TLVs MUST always be included in the LSP object. In case of an error

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-02.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : PCEP Procedures and Protocol Extensions for Using PCE as a Central Controller (PCECC) for Segment Routing (SR)