Hi, Mike:
Thanks for your suggestions. I have added the following sentences in section
6.2 as:
"To accomplish ECMP effects, the PCE can send multiple EPR objects to the
same node, with the same route priority and peer address value but different
next hop addresses."
Will update the
Aijun:
Thank you for your quick response.
I’ve answered questions below. Would you let me know when you update your
draft? I’ll re-read the sections that changed and make additional
suggestions. If you think it would be useful to add 2 (or more) next hops
per EPR, please let me know.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information
Authors : Mike Koldychev
Hi Aijun,
Thanks for clarifying Q1.
Regarding Q2, you can probably mention that in the draft. Multiple EPR objects
MAY be sent for the same destination, which results in ECMP to that destination.
Thanks,
Mike.
From: Pce On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 10:55 PM
To: 'Mike
Hi, Susan and all:
Update one hyperlink on the contents, please refer to this mail for comments
responses.
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:04 PM
To: 'Susan Hares' ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'idr-chairs' ; 'pce-chairs'
Subject: Re: [Pce]
