Hello Adrian,
Many thanks for your comments, brilliant!
I am preparing a update to address your comments and other guys' comments
together, please wait for few days.
Cheers,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, Feb
OK, good, I will work on it to prepare a update ASAP.
Cheng
From: xiong.q...@zte.com.cn [mailto:xiong.q...@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 3:25 PM
To: d...@dhruvdhody.com
Cc: Cheng Li ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org; Zhangka
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG L
Hi Dhruv,
Thanks for your reply!
I agree with you and it is much better to align with SR-MPLS using
LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV.
Best Regards,
Quan
Original
From: DhruvDhody
To: 熊泉00091065;
Cc: c...@huawei.com ;pce@ietf.org
;draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org
;zhan..
Hi,
I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already
been disclosed to the IETF.
Regards,
Mahendra
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 10:03 PM, Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) <
mkold...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclose
Hi WG,
I have read the latest version of the document. I support the WG LC, as a
co-author. This work is necessary for SRv6 deployment of the PCE.
Thanks,
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 12:39 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Hi,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks,
Mike.
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 10:21 PM
To: preje...@rtbrick.com; msiva...@gmail.com; c...@huawei.com; Mike Koldychev
(mkoldych) ; M
