Looks good to me!
Thanks
Andrew
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 11:31 PM
To: Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Cc: julien.meu...@orange.com ; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor
CAUTION: This is an
Hi Andrew, Authors,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:08 AM Andrew Stone (Nokia)
wrote:
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> Read the document and support adoption. The document is clear and
> relatively straight forward to follow and the use case does fill a hole
> within the stateful toolset.
>
> One non-blocking
Hi, all
I support the adoption. It is an interesting item.
Best Regards
Zongpeng Du
duzongp...@foxmail.com & duzongp...@chinamobile.com
From: julien.meuric
Date: 2023-06-20 15:46
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor
Hi all,
It has been
Hi PCE,
(The previous email was sent too fast, fixed some syntax errors and resend)
This update addressed the comments from Adrian, Ran Chen and Yingzhen. Many
thanks to their valuable comments[1], please review and confirm, thanks!
This update also tries to address the comments from Ketan. We
Hi PCE,
This update addressed the comments from Adrian, Ran Chen and Yingzhen. Many
thanks to their valuable comments[1], please review and confirm, thanks!
This update also try to address the comments from Ketan. We believe that we
have addressed the editorial from Ketan[1].
Till now, we may
Hi PCE WG,
Read the document and support adoption. The document is clear and relatively
straight forward to follow and the use case does fill a hole within the
stateful toolset.
One non-blocking question:
- In version 16, section 5.1, the final sentence is "This information can be
used in
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Path Computation
Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Extensions for Segment Routing leveraging the
Hi PCE chairs,
Recharter changes look good to me. The update looks needed considering the
prevalence of all things SPRING related.
Thanks
Andrew
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 1:38 AM
To: "pce@ietf.org"
Subject: [Pce] Proposed PCE WG Charter update
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Local Protection Enforcement in PCEP'
(draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-11.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Path Computation Element Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Jim Guichard, Andrew Alston
Thanks for your review, Sue.
Authors, thanks for all your work. Before we send the document to the RFC
Editor, please consider whether to make changes based on the OPSDIR review. I
agree with the points Sue has made; points 2 and 3 are about the description of
MAY clauses and there is room for
10 matches
Mail list logo
