Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13.txt

Hi WG, I addressed all comments that I received so far (let me know if I missed anything). I copied some text from [I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy] into Section 5.3, to avoid making a normative reference to that draft. So we should probably review it again in more detail. Also, we ne

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi Mike, Thanks for your reply! I am not sure about this use case. From my understanding, serveral candidate paths may be associated to a SR policy in PCE environment, (if this may happen) but if all candidate paths are judged to invalid by PCE (for example as per draft-chen-pce-sr-policy-cp-va

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: PCEP Extensions for SR Policy Candidate Paths Authors: Mike Koldychev Siva Sivabalan Colby Barth

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi Cheng, Thanks for your review! Comments inline with . Thanks, Mike. From: Cheng Li Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 11:09 AM To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ; draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi Quan, Thanks for your review! Comments inline with . Thanks, Mike. From: Pce On Behalf Of xiong.q...@zte.com.cn Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2024 10:01 PM To: d...@dhruvdhody.com; draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi Samuel, IMO, it’s nice to have explicit and granular capability advertisement, so that the PCEP speakers are aware of what the other side supports. It’s not purely informational, some of these TLVs modify the PCC behavior, so the PCE may want to know in advance whether PCC will follow instru

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi Gyan, Thanks for your review! Comments inline with . Thanks, Mike. From: Gyan Mishra Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 1:31 AM To: Dhruv Dhody Cc: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi Haomian, Thanks for your review! Comments inline with . Thanks, Mike. From: Zhenghaomian Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 10:57 PM To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ; draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-pol

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi WG, I read the document and support the WGLC. However, I also have some minor comments below. 1. Abstract A Segment Routing (SR) Policy [RFC9256] is a non-empty set of SR Candidate Paths, that share the same tuple. 1.Nits: s/that/which. 2.share the

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-multipath-10.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-multipath-10.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: PCEP Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information Authors: Mike Koldychev Siva Sivabalan Tarek Saad Vishnu P