Re: [Pce] Best Wishes for the future of PCE WG !

Hi JP, Thanks for the great discussions we have had over the last 15 years. I wish you very best, I am sure you do and will excell in everything you put your mind, focus and effort on. Cheers, Igor From:JP Vasseur (jvasseur) To:pce@ietf.org,Julien

Re: [Pce] PCEP as an SDN controller protocol?

Excellent question, John. Wonder myself. Let's ask Gert. He is very good at defining thibgs they are not :-) Yours also irresoectively,igor Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:32 PM, John E Drake wrote: Hi, So, what exactly is it that PCEP should

Re: [Pce] PCEP as an SDN controller protocol?

, Igor From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:50 AM To: Igor Bryskin; Jonathan Hardwick; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE: PCEP as an SDN controller protocol? Hi, You can use RESTCONF, NETCONF or anything similar

Re: [Pce] [Teas] [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Italo Busi Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 6:38 PM To: Igor Bryskin; Francesco Lazzeri; Fatai Zhang; Dieter Beller Cc: m...@ietf.org; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org); Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org) Subject: RE: [Teas] [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas

Re: [Pce] [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francesco Lazzeri Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 5:02 AM To: Igor Bryskin; Fatai Zhang; Dieter Beller Cc: m...@ietf.org; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org); Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org) Subject: Re: [Teas] [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html

Re: [Pce] [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

catered by the subordinate PNCs. And BTW said abstract TE topologies should be kept up-to-date by the PNCs (i.e. with updates, stateful). Igor From: Teas [mailto:teas-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francesco Lazzeri Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 12:42 PM To: Igor Bryskin; Fatai Zhang; Dieter

Re: [Pce] [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

h, SRLGs) are defined by the path. Igor From: Francesco Lazzeri [mailto:francesco.lazz...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 9:26 AM To: Igor Bryskin; Fatai Zhang; Dieter Beller Cc: m...@ietf.org; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org); Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.o

Re: [Pce] [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

des. Igor BR Francesco From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Igor Bryskin Sent: 04 November, 2016 7:12 PM To: Dieter Beller <dieter.bel...@nokia.com<mailto:dieter.bel...@nokia.com>> Cc: m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org<mailto:cc..

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

, November 03, 2016 4:12 PM To: Igor Bryskin; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org); m...@ietf.org Subject: RE: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00 Igor, When you say "state"

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Young, >From the provider controller point of view COMPUTE_ONLY TE tunnels will have >exactly the same state as "normal" (COMPUTE_ADN_PROVISION) TE tunnels. Igor From: Leeyoung Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 3:42 PM To: Igor Bryskin; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); Daniele C

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

@nokia.com] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 3:17 PM To: Leeyoung; Daniele Ceccarelli; Igor Bryskin; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org); m...@ietf.org Subject: RE: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00 Isn't the intention of defining &qu

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

[mailto:daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 10:19 AM To: Igor Bryskin; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org); m...@ietf.org Subject: RE: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00 Hi Igor

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

IMHO we do not need both global and action RPC. The latter is more elegant but essentially the same as the former. Igor From: Teas [mailto:teas-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT) Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 10:25 AM To: Igor Bryskin; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

the path has stopped being feasible any longer or (ideally) a better path is available. Igor From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 9:49 AM To: Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); Igor Bryskin; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t

[Pce] draft-zhang-ccamp-transport-yang-gap-analysis-01

Hi, In the 4.4. Function Summary and Related YANG Models, I read: +-+---+---+ |Path Comp. | Path Computation pre | |

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data-00.txt

Young, One important advantage of publishing TE information directly onto PCE(s) is the ability to do so in an incremental way. Consider, for example, a WDM LSP is being set up. The only change that is happening on each of the involved links is one lambda channel is changing its priority level

Re: [Pce] PCEP ERO

: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.g...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:08 PM To: Igor Bryskin; adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Zhangxian (Xian)'; 'Dhruv Dhody'; 'Julien Meuric' Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] PCEP ERO Igor, Reasonable people can always disagree. :-) IB Agree, it's been

Re: [Pce] PCEP ERO

Adrian, Please see in-line. -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:14 AM To: Igor Bryskin; 'Zhangxian (Xian)'; 'Dhruv Dhody'; 'Julien Meuric' Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] PCEP ERO Hi Igor, Why don't you put

Re: [Pce] PCEP ERO

) and no flexibility must be left for decisions on transit nodes. Regards, Igor -Original Message- From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.g...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 9:46 AM To: Igor Bryskin; adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Zhangxian (Xian)'; 'Dhruv Dhody'; 'Julien Meuric' Cc: pce

Re: [Pce] PCEP ERO

. Igor -Original Message- From: Zhangxian (Xian) [mailto:zhang.x...@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:17 PM To: Igor Bryskin; adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Dhruv Dhody'; 'Julien Meuric' Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] PCEP ERO Hi, Igor, I think you raise up a good question

Re: [Pce] PCEP ERO

Hello, You are right Julien and Adrian, this is a very old issue. One thing that has been missing IMO is a flag in a numbered/unnumbered link ERSO indicating whether the indicated side of the link is outbound or inbound wrt the path direction from its source to destination. The lack of said

[Pce] Comments on draft-lee-pce-ted-alternatives-01.txt

Hi, Here is my comments on the draft “Alternative Approaches to Traffic Engineering Database Creation and Maintenance for Path Computation Elements” http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lee-pce-ted-alternatives-01.txt General comments. 1. Everywhere you say IGP you mean, I am sure, IGP-TE. It