Dear Chairs How are you doing?
This is Felix from China Telecom. From my own perspective, I think this document has specified useful procedures and PCEP extensions when a PCE-based controller is also responsible for computing the explicit forwarding paths in the SRv6 network. So I support the WG adoption of this work. ___________________________ Best Regards! 梁筱斌 Felix Liang IP Network Architect Network Technology Research Dept, Research Institute of China Telecom Co., Ltd 109 West Zhongshan Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, CN O: +86 20 3863 9179 C: +86 189 2956 4809 F: +86 20 3863 9572 Email: liang...@chinatelecom.cn <mailto:liang...@chinatelecom.cn>, felix.liang.1...@hotmail.com <mailto:felix.liang.1...@hotmail.com> On 1/17/23, 02:00, "Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com <mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>" <pce-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com <mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>> wrote: Hi all, This e-mail starts an adoption poll for draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item? Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the WG should not adopt it. Thanks, Julien [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6/> _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
