Hi, Jon,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:25 AM Jonathan Hardwick <
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
> Spencer,
>
> I think it is as Adrian has described below (thanks Adrian). I will add
> the reference to RFC 8413.
>
Thanks!
Spencer
> Best regards
> Jon
>
> -Original Message-
> F
Hi, Jonathan,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Hardwick <
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
> Hi Spencer
>
> Thanks for your comments. Please see [Jon] below.
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 0
Hi, Jon,
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Jonathan Hardwick <
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
> Hi Spencer
>
> Many thanks for these comments. I'm picking up this thread and replying
> as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I am very
> sorry for the delay.
>
> Pleas
Hi, Dhruv,
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Spencer,
>
>
>
> *From:* Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 07 August 2017 21:17
> *To:* Dhruv Dhody
> *Cc:* Alexey Melnikov ; cmarga...@juniper.net;
> draft-i
hat confused me is that in
English, multiple negatives don't work well - so, "not without TLS"
simplifies to "with TLS" in common usage.
Are you using "not without TLS" to mean "TLS usage required", or something
like that?
Spencer
>
>
> Reg
This is Alexey's ballot, but ...
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Alexey Melnikov
wrote:
> One more little thing:
>
>
> In figure 5, I see: Send Error (not without TLS)
>
> What does "not without TLS" mean? I think the figure is sending PCErr in
> the clear (without TLS)
>
This text wasn't clear
Hi, Deborah/Dhruv,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:03 AM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
>
> Yes, thanks Mirja for you detailed review.
>
> As Dhruv noted, this is not representing an average utilization, but the
> current bandwidth utilization. As Dhruv noted, we could swap this sentence
> in
Dhruv,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Will add. Thanks for the text.
Now that you have feedback from at least one SEC AD, I wanted to add that I
thought your text was very helpful (and even more helpful with Kathleen's
addition, of course).
Thanks,
Spencer, who isn't s
