Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document

support. s. > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) > Sent: 14 September 2014 11:06 > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE > WG Document > > Dear WG, > > We had several

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document

support. s. > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) > Sent: 14 September 2014 11:06 > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE > WG Document > > Dear WG, > > We had several

Re: [Pce] Solicit Comments on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00

I’d suggest you to have a look at draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-00.txt Thanks. s. > On Nov 1, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Lizhenbin wrote: > > Hi Folks, > We proposes two drafts on the new type of segment in the segment routing: > draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segmen

Re: [Pce] Working group last call (including final IPR check) for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09

Hi, as a contributor, I’m not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks. s. > On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Hardwick > wrote: > > Dear PCE working group, > > This email starts a working group last call for > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09. > https://datatracker.ietf.org