f.org"
主题
Re: [Pce] 答复: Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08
El 30/07/2013 18:33, Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich) escribió:
Hi PCE WG,
3) Treat this as an errata to RFC5440 ““The BANDWIDTH of OT 1 and
OT 2 object body have a fixed length of 4 bytes.”, and
El 30/07/2013 18:33, Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich) escribió:
Hi PCE WG,
3)Treat this as an errata to RFC5440 ““The BANDWIDTH *of OT 1 and OT
2* object body have a fixed length of 4 bytes.”, and define new OT
for GMPLS
PCErs, all
Rather than "Errata" :) consider it a liberal inter
Hi all,
I think a new object type could be better and simple.
Thanks
Fatai
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Ramon Casellas
发送时间: 2013年7月30日 17:32
收件人: Jonathan Hardwick; pce@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08
On 07/30/2013 11:0
