Hi Jon,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:57:55PM +, Jonathan Hardwick wrote:
> Hi Benjamin
>
> As I was preparing the next revision of this document, I realised I'd
> forgotten to reply to your email. (I thought I had replied, but I can find
> no evidence that I did so!)
I have been guilty of t
Hi Benjamin
As I was preparing the next revision of this document, I realised I'd forgotten
to reply to your email. (I thought I had replied, but I can find no evidence
that I did so!)
Anyway, I think we have converged. Please see my proposals below, and
apologies for my tardiness.
Cheers
J
Hi John/Ben,
Happy New Year!
Both OSPF and IS-IS MSD documents have been published.
Wrt PCE - they merely state that if there’s no PCEP session between nodes
advertising and receiving this information, the receiving node has no other
means to learn the MSD of the advertising node, since it is loc
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:59:28PM +, Jonathan Hardwick wrote:
> Hi Benjamin
>
> Sorry for the delayed response. Please find replies to your comments below.
And my apologies as well for waiting until after the holidays to
counter-respond.
> Best regards
> Jon
>
>
> Abstract
>
>
Hi Benjamin
Sorry for the delayed response. Please find replies to your comments below.
Best regards
Jon
Abstract
This document specifies extensions to the Path
Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) that allow a
stateful PCE to compute and initiate Traffic
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refe
