Re: [Pce] Clarification regarding draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-11/RFC8664

Thanks Dhruv for the information. On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 4:08 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi Mrinmoy, > > You are correct. There was a recent errata on RFC 8664 regarding this > issue - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6753 > > The authors of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6 should also fix

Re: [Pce] Clarification regarding draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-11/RFC8664

Hi Mrinmoy, You are correct. There was a recent errata on RFC 8664 regarding this issue - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6753 The authors of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6 should also fix this issue in their draft. Thanks for noticing it. Thanks! Dhruv On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 4:01 PM

[Pce] Clarification regarding draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-11/RFC8664

Hello Team, I have a doubt regarding below section of the above draft: 4.3.1 . SRv6-ERO Subobject NAI Type (NT): Indicates the type and format of the NAI contained in the object body, if any is prese