Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08

2016-11-16 Thread stephane.litkowski
Hi More inline [SLI2] From: Cyril Margaria [mailto:cyril.marga...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 23:37 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08 Hi Stephane, please see inline On 14 November 2016 at 13:05

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08

2016-11-16 Thread Cyril Margaria
Hi Stephane, please see inline On 14 November 2016 at 13:05, wrote: > > > *From:* Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Cyril Margaria > *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2016 23:40 > Dear PCE'ers > > I reviewed the document and I have the following comments/questions: > > 1)

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08

2016-11-14 Thread stephane.litkowski
Hi Cyril, Please find some inline comments. Brgds, From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cyril Margaria Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 23:40 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08 Dear PCE'ers I reviewed the document and I hav

[Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08

2016-11-14 Thread Cyril Margaria
Dear PCE'ers I reviewed the document and I have the following comments/questions: 1) The document implies that the PCC has to /MUST do IP address to SID conversion, I think that it would allow a more simpler PCC if that capability is optional and negotiated with additional error codes to