Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)

2017-10-04 Thread Julien Meuric
Hi all, We may add on top of the reasons below the strong impact PCE-initiation has from the implementation's perspective (which is somehow linked to the first 2 items). Up to I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce, it was all about configuration on PCCs, just allowing PCEs to trigger actions. I-D.ietf-pce-pce

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)

2017-10-04 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
Hi Mirja Many thanks for these comments. I'm picking up this thread and replying as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I am very sorry for the delay. Please see my proposed resolutions inline below, marked with "Jon>" Best regards Jon

[Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)

2017-08-25 Thread Mirja Kühlewind
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please r