Hi,
I am glad the companion document [0] is on the SPRING agenda. It is not
clear if the plan is to move it to SPRING WG with a change in draft name
and make it fully protocol agnostic by removing any details specific to PCE.
Please go over the minutes of 113 [1] and provide an update on the list
Hi Dhruv,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
For comments received during IETF113 – I checked notes:
https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-113-pce?both
And it seems to me that those should be covered already in latest version
(v02), which will be presented. To be more specific:
* Comment from Ta
Hi Samuel,
Thank you for your reply, I hope this update to the list triggers further
discussion here and in the WG session.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:31 PM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) wrote:
> Hi Dhruv,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback.
>
>
>
> For comments received during IETF1
