RtgDir review: ddraft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-09
Hello,
I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and
sometimes on special request
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa
Andersson
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 2:28 PM
To: rtg-...@ietf.org; "review: ddraft-ietf-teas-pce-native-.all"@ietf.org; TEAS
WG Chairs ; TEAS WG ; pce@ietf.org; 'Yemin
(Amy' ; LucAndré Burdet
Subject: [Pce] teas
RtgDir review: ddraft-iet
Hi, Loa:
Thanks for your review.
We will update the draft in next week to reflect your comments. The detail
responses will also be provided later.
Comments from other experts are also welcome.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: teas-bou
Hi Xufeng,
Thanks for the note. Minutes fixed.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-ccamp-01.htm
BR
Daniele
From: Teas [mailto:teas-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xufeng Liu
Sent: martedì 29 novembre 2016 22:56
To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; 'CCAMP'
Cc: m...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
The draft minutes for the joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS YANG meeting at IETF 96 are now
available. Please see "session II" at the link below. Thanks to all our
minute takers! Please let me know if you have any comments or corrections.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the excellent analysis and summary.
I think that distributing the time reservation info just to the PCC and then
realigning the other PCEs is the best option.
Performing a realignment via IGP can cause scalability issues as you said
(maybe BGP could be the only appropriat
Hi Dieter,
In line.
BR
Daniele
From: Dieter Beller [mailto:dieter.bel...@alcatel-lucent.com]
Sent: venerdì 24 luglio 2015 07:47
To: Daniele Ceccarelli
Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk; pce@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] Architectural question about resource-scheduled LSPs
Hi Daniele,
pleas
Hi Daniele,
please find my comments in-line below.
Thanks,
Dieter
On 23.07.2015 16:13, Daniele Ceccarelli
wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the excellent analysis and summary.
I think that distributing the time reservation info
: Re: [Pce] [Teas] Architectural question about resource-scheduled LSPs
Hi Daniele,
please find my comments in-line below.
Thanks,
Dieter
On 23.07.2015 16:13, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the excellent analysis and summary.
I think that distributing the time reservation
All,
A reminder on this... if you're presenting, please send slides to me and the
chairs by Friday.
Cheers
Matt
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
All,
On the agenda for Buenos Aires, we have a session on Tuesday April 5th, 17:30 -
19:00 in Atlantico B. This is currently listed as a TEAS meeting, but is
intended as a joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS meeting for the discussion of Yang models.
If you'd like a slot to present a Yang draft in B
All,
Thanks to those who have sent slides already. Final reminder for those who
haven't :)
Cheers
Matt
> All,
>
> A reminder on this... if you're presenting, please send slides to me and
> the chairs by Friday.
>
> Cheers
>
> Matt
___
Pce mailing
All,
On the agenda for Berlin, we have a session on Thursday July 21, 16:20 - 18:20
in Charlottenburg II/III. This is listed on the IETF agenda as a PCE meeting,
but it is intended as a joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS meeting for the discussion of Yang
models.
If you'd like a slot to present a
We have posted the agenda for the joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS meeting. The agenda is
the second session at the link below.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/96/agenda/pce/
If you are presenting then please send your slides to the chairs by the end of
Sunday July 17.
Best regards
Jon (on behalf of
All,
A reminder: deadline for slot requests is Friday.
Cheers
Matt
> All,
>
> On the agenda for Buenos Aires, we have a session on Tuesday April 5th,
> 17:30 - 19:00 in Atlantico B. This is currently listed as a TEAS meeting,
> but is intended as a joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS
; 5th,
> > 17:30 - 19:00 in Atlantico B. This is currently listed as a TEAS
> > meeting, but is intended as a joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS meeting for the
> > discussion of Yang models.
> >
> > If you'd like a slot to present a Yang draft in Buenos Aires, please
> > sen
enos Aires, we have a session on Tuesday April
>> > 5th,
>> > 17:30 - 19:00 in Atlantico B. This is currently listed as a TEAS
>> > meeting, but is intended as a joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS meeting for the
>> > discussion of Yang models.
>> >
>> > If you&#
m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] CCAMP and JOINT YANG session agenda @IETF97
Hi all,
the first version of the agenda for the CCAMP session and the Joint YANG
session is available at the following link.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/agenda/agenda-97-ccamp-01
Please let
ave your comments
Thanks
MPLS, PCE, TEAS and CCAMP (chairs and secretaries)
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
All,
The agenda for this has been published (bottom half of
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-teas).
Please send slides for presentation by Friday, April 1st to me and the Chairs.
Cheers
Matt
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
http
Igor,
I have discussed the issue with many TE domains with co-authors and we have
addressed it in section 3.3 of the draft:
As discussed in section 2.2, there are some scalability issues with path
computation requests in a multi-domain TE network with many TE domains, in
terms of the number of
Hi Italo,
Y said:
"IMHO, this approach solves the issue and makes path computation applicable
also to multi-domain TE networks with many TE networks".
I respectfully disagree with this conclusion for all the reasons I provided in
the response to Francesco.
Cheers,
Igor.
From: Italo Busi
Se
Igor,
As far as I can understand your arguments with Francesco, you are assuming that
the MDSC shall request path computations to all its underlying PNCs (and even
multiple times).
The approach described in section 3.3 of the draft is different. The idea is
that the MDSC can use the TE Topolog
Italo,
In your analogy how you can be sure that a better (faster) path from New Your,
say, to Seattle is not via Canada offering wide and empty intra-country
highways?
Igor
From: Italo Busi
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 10:21 AM
To: Igor Bryskin; Francesco Lazzeri; Fatai Zhang; Dieter Beller
24 matches
Mail list logo
