;;
pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>; Michael Gorokhovsky
mailto:michael.gorokhov...@rbbn.com>>
Subject: Re: [Pce] A technical concern regarding
draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy-00
Christian,
Lots of thanks for your prompt response to my concerns about the SR-CS Policy
draft.
Unfor
Vainshtein
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 3:48 PM
To: Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)
Cc: draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org; spr...@ietf.org; Rotem
Cohen ; Nitsan Dolev ;
pce@ietf.org; Michael Gorokhovsky
Subject: Re: [Pce] A technical concern regarding
draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr
Christian,
Lots of thanks for your prompt response to my concerns about the SR-CS Policy
draft.
Unfortunately I will not be able to attend the SPRING session later today (even
remotely).
Regarding your explanation, I believe that the key point is the sentence
“everything not running over CS-SR
Hi Sasha,
Many thanks for reviewing draft-schmutzer-pce-cs-sr-policy
(draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy) and sharing your input / concerns. Let me
try to address them.
CS-SR policies don’t require additional unprotected adj-SIDs. The unprotected
adj-SID part of the two adj-SIDs you mentioned
