On 14 Dec 2006, at 18:18, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I propose moving the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into
the extra folder, compiled as individual files.
What's the advantage of doing that?
Separation of Concerns:
padawan12 wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:52:07 +0100
IOhannes m zmölnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am a string advocate
Me too,
;-)
but those damn symbols can't contain whitespace
?? says who ??
mf.adsr
IOhannes
___
PD-dev mailing list
On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:52 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
As the author of the only modified version of IEMGUI in five
years, I say no, we don't need this to happen.
It wasn't a question of need. We are all fed ;). Do you have any
actual objections?
well, i
If we are going to have full-fledged namespaces, than this is an essential
step. Think C without any #includes or Java without any #imports. Only the
bare minimum is
in the language itself. Everything else is a library.
in Python 2.5, Tk is still a configure-time option, which means,
On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:54 PM, carmen wrote:
If we are going to have full-fledged namespaces, than this is an
essential step. Think C without any #includes or Java without any
#imports. Only the bare minimum is
in the language itself. Everything else is a library.
in Python 2.5, Tk is
Does anyone know anything about the 64-bit support in Tcl/Tk? I was
thinking of making 64-bit native G5 and Xeon builds of Pd, once
everything is release.
That said, does the --enable-threads thing do anything for us?
.hc
Thanks Hans and IOhan, I think Bryans offering covers most
of what is needed, adequate to muddle by until such time when we
have real strings.
Andy
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:41:03 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can do a fair amount of string handling with
Plus you can use that string format directly with Martin Peach's
network objects, AFAIK.
.hc
On Dec 16, 2006, at 7:16 AM, padawan12 wrote:
Thanks Hans and IOhan, I think Bryans offering covers most
of what is needed, adequate to muddle by until such time when we
have real strings.
Andy
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
But yes, it leaves a lot to be desired. Bryan Jurish has taken a
different approach, which is to use lists of bytes to represent strings.
Might be worth checking out.
An advantage using the list-of-bytes approach is that because each
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in [objectmaker].
What is [objectmaker]?
what's at the end of the receive-symbol of the same name, that thing that
creates all your
10 matches
Mail list logo
