On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Albert Graef wrote:
The only advantage that Tcl has is, as you point out, that Pd already
uses it anyway.
Another advantage of Tcl is that the syntax is like that of Pd:
space-separated elements, not much quoting necessary. In addition,
elements missing from Pd and chara
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I edited it quite a bit. Split it in 5 parts total: the normal types,
the messagebox-only types, the pseudo-types, the user-defined normal
types, and the user-defined pseudo-types. By pseudo-type I mean
something not used in t_atom::a_type. I added
Am 10.07.2008 um 19:35 schrieb Rich E:
I see that [pool] has the ability to share a data space among
different buffers by taking a name as its first argument. I am
digging through its code right now, but am not familiar with the flext
API. I don't yet see how it manages to allow different [poo
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> I think, Pd could benefit a lot by providing a default scripting
> language to write operations like [range] which are tediuos to do as
> an abstraction. Altough I'm not a fan of Tcl (and would prefer Lua),
> Tcl would be a natural choice as it's available anyway.
But Tcl
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>
> The "Open", "Pending", and "Closed" states have to do with attention,
> not the state of the bug. If someone reports a bug, then no dev can
indeed, and thus frank is right when requesting that a bug should not be
set to "Closed" when it still needs attent
