Bugs item #1944125, was opened at 2008-04-16 11:24
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpeach
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1944125&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
Patches item #2030539, was opened at 2008-07-28 13:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mrpeach
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=2030539&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Hi IOhannes,
> how about the [amixer] external in externals/iem/ ?
> i have no idea about it's stability though (i hardly ever use it)
Thanks, that did work well.
I tried banging it over 100 times per second and it's running solid.
--
David Shimamoto
PSPunch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am in need for an object to emulate the following command.
>
> $ amixer -c 1 cset numid=2 0
>
>
> Perhaps an object such as...
>
> [alsa_ctl 1 2]
>
> Where the right inlet modifies numID and left for the value.
>
>
> This is planned to be executed several t
Hi all,
I am in need for an object to emulate the following command.
$ amixer -c 1 cset numid=2 0
Perhaps an object such as...
[alsa_ctl 1 2]
Where the right inlet modifies numID and left for the value.
This is planned to be executed several times per second which executing
the shell comm
Hi Thomas and Miller,
For some reason I thought that the latency was due to Portaudio.
So in short, is the current consensus that the cause is somewhat
"uncertain"?
--
David Shimamoto
>> Well, I've seen latencies down to 6 msec in linux using ringbuffers.
>> They
>> theoretically only add
Hi Hans,
> I hear that using ASIO4ALL on Windows can help quite a bit:
>
> http://www.asio4all.com/
If my understanding is correct, this is more of a rapper which adds ASIO
support to hardware not designed to.
As a side effect it reduces latencies on mainly AC'97 chips which is fun
when wor
