Hi there:
Hans-Christoph Steiner said :
>
> Here's how I see it: I think we should first reorganize the code and
> streamline the GUI. I think we can change things that are only in the
> current u_main.tk. Then once that is complete, we can start making more
> substantial changes. So thing
Bugs item #2465348, was opened at 2008-12-24 19:02
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by chrislb
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2465348&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #2465348, was opened at 2008-12-24 19:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by chrislb
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2465348&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
Bugs item #2465348, was opened at 2008-12-24 19:02
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by chrislb
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2465348&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #2465348, was opened at 2008-12-24 19:02
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by chrislb
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2465348&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Here's how I see it: I think we should first reorganize the code and
streamline the GUI. I think we can change things that are only in
the current u_main.tk. Then once that is complete, we can start
making more substantial changes. So things like updating the
preference pane GUIs (Path
Hi all:
One question just occured to me on starting with a minimal pd.tk in the new
pd-devel is that, how would we then make incremental patches againest the main
branch? i seem to remember incremental changes was in discussion in previous
thread on pd-devel.
cheers
chun
___
Hans-Christoph Steiner said :
>
> Now that I have done some coding on the new Tcl side of things, I
> have some questions to pose here. (crossing fingers, hoping to avoid
> bike shed issues :D )
>
> - first, does anyone object to making the Tcl files use 90 or 100
> character widths? Tcl
Hi,
I understand that GEM uses a rather old version of the "Particle System
API" (http://www.particlesystems.org/) for its particle related objects.
The later major version of this API seems to be more efficient and adds
new features for diverse movements.
Just wondered if there already have
