On Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 11:08:42AM +0100, Pierpaolo Marcon wrote:
> I'm trying to put Pd on a DSP processor, but I need to separate completely
> the Pd engine from the GUI.
> Does anybody knows if it is available on the web the Pd engine code?
> (without GUI)
sure.. just download PD from miller puc
only a good idea if there were already problems, that
> > other developers broke things ... which I cannot really remember.
> > If not, it will only prevent some people from developing, trying to
> > improve other code, improving the build system etc.
>
> iirc, carmen once m
On Wed Feb 14, 2007 at 03:15:10PM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
> Sorry, posted this to the wrong list the first time. Thanks Frank
>
>
>
> Hallo,
> I'd like to be added to the CVS dev list, such that I can begin
> posting a few of the publicly-useful abstractions I've been working
> on,
On Sat Jan 27, 2007 at 05:06:06PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:56 AM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
>
> >Hallo!
> >
> >>The Windows scripts might not send emails, since it's a pain to do that on
> >>Windows. Feel free to get that working.
> >
> >How should I get this wo
On Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 12:03:14AM +0100, Georg Holzmann wrote:
> Hallo!
>
> >>So is there a way how the externals can find the shared library, whithout
> >>copying it into a global library path like /usr/lib/ ?
>
> It seems that the only way is, to add the
> /full/path/to/installed/library/dire
On Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 04:30:20PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
>
> >Hallo!
> >
> >>Okay, I build now a shared library because I have a lot of shared code - it
> >>will be installed in the same directory as the pd externals.
> >
> >Hm
On Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 02:47:05PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Is it possible to turn on anti-aliasing for one Tk "create" command? If so,
> it would be easy to make the patch coords and the circle in the bang
> anti-aliased, while the boxes remain crisp.
normal Tk doesn't do antia
> Automatic type conversion sounds like a really bad idea if the language only
> partially supports it. Pd is strongly typed
do you think the target user base wants to think in terms of casting types? i
don't. i have a feeling that was why there are so few types. i think most users
wan't to be
> Automatic type conversion sounds like a really bad idea if the language only
> partially supports it. Pd is strongly typed
is it? it mainly has numbers that occasionally look like symbols, and symbols
that more than occasionally look like lists and/or strings..
> , so what Martin says is def
> If we are going to have full-fledged namespaces, than this is an essential
> step. Think C without any #includes or Java without any #imports. Only the
> bare minimum is
> in the language itself. Everything else is a library.
in Python 2.5, Tk is still a configure-time option, which means,
On Sat Dec 02, 2006 at 05:34:44PM -0800, Miller Puckette wrote:
> For the moment it's hopeless... it would take me finally figuring out a
> stable and compatible escape mechanism for strings in Pd...
strings in pd? ooh i can't wait..
>
> cheers
> Miller
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 01:00:30AM +
ive found the file src/ChangeLog on the devel_0_39 branch, which contains some
information on ImPd 0.37 through DesireData 0.39.
are the changes from the devel branch documented somewhere? things like the
scheduler, audio interfaces, SIMD/vectorization/memory-alignment, whatever else
may be dif
On Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 02:02:52PM +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:39:50PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > >On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > >I advocate use of consistent syntax all over pd. Consistency is
> > >more important than minimality
On Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 01:12:52AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Well, that one was submitted almost two years ago, Miller responded over a
> year ago, and no one ever followed up on his comment. So that sounds to me
> like its
> abandoned.
i'm pretty sure a recent email mentioned m
> and that is the question: why do we necessarily need the fftw based
> fft-objects in plain pd and cannot use externals?
> so the only drawback is see is: the objects are called [fftw~] instead of
> [fft~]; but lo and behold, i vaguely remembered krzysztof magic in cyclone,
> where a newly
>
On Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Vincent Lordier wrote:
> Hi enthusiasts devs !
>
> I want to work on pd's code readability and structure, only refactoring, not
> adding new features. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refactoring)
> The final goal is to make PD easy to scale (desactivate MIDI,
On Mon Aug 21, 2006 at 08:29:13PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:08 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> >
> >>I would like to know where the configuration system of pd is heading to. I
> >>have read many
> >>months ago
On Mon Aug 21, 2006 at 06:07:38PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> hi.
>
> i just submitted a patch against the 0.40-prerelease that adds a new object
> [initbang], which can be used to trigger a constructor in an abstraction.
>
> this allows to have abstractions with runtime customizable con
On Sat Aug 12, 2006 at 11:08:16AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> SourceForge also has Subversion we can use. I think we all agreed in the
> past that the SourceForge repository would be the best one for now.
why is the Sourceforge repository best? they have by far the worst uptime
re
19 matches
Mail list logo
