Yeah I've been a vi and screen man since... (dreamy blur out effect and the
hands of a clock spinning backwards)
But I think you just sold vim there Frank. It's a deal.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:51:09 -0600
"Kyle Klipowicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm I use vi for terminal stuff, but never t
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:46:38 +0100
Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo,
> Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> > Oops, do I read this correctly, that on Windows (or *for* Windows) I need to
> > have some kind of pd.dll to compile an external? And that means, I
andling with [list2symbol] and
> things like that. But yes, it leaves a lot to be desired. Bryan
> Jurish has taken a different approach, which is to use lists of bytes
> to represent strings. Might be worth checking out.
>
> .hc
>
> On Dec 15, 2006, at 2:06 AM, padaw
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:52:07 +0100
IOhannes m zmölnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am a string advocate
Me too, but those damn symbols can't contain whitespace
:)
___
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Anything that adds modularity and allows separate
compilation has to be a good thing. It seems
a logical partition to make too, graphical things
should probably have their own space.
2c
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:26:32 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In a first step to
A new and keen developer on the forums has asked - "What about text processing
in Pd?" to which I replied "Pd doesn't do strings".
I tie myself in knots trying string-like operations sometimes :), so I know
its a can of worms, but what are the fundamental limitations surrounding symbol.
How do we
Wow, there's a huge can-o-worms. I'm not going to touch the tin opener
other than to say it seems bad, but I don't really understand. From what
I remember of commercial law classes you just can't do that with a contract.
But then how does a "license" differ from a "contract"?
For me, I'm very tor
Just checking it's not a problem with [makefilename], it's not.
I'd expect an X from trimming any raw X, in other words [list trim]
should do nothing to any data that doesn't have "list" at the
start. Is that what you would expect?
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:51:37 -0400
Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:39:16 -0400 (EDT)
Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pd shouldn't check for another pd running. It is extremely common to use
> two pd's at once. This is required due to conflicts between audio and
> video. This is even something that we teach to newbies in wor
[me~]
|
[LMAO~]
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:15:16 +0200
Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo,
> Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
>
> > What would be really awesome is an ascii -> pd converter for those highly
> > detailed ASCII patches that Frank is always posting o
10 matches
Mail list logo
