On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Obviously usefulness is essential.
Not even: the 6809 CPU has those two curious opcodes in it.
BRA, or branch always, means if(1) goto ...;
BRN, or branch never, means if(0) goto ...;
this is among 14 other types of branches like branch if
On Sep 16, 2006, at 6:38 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Arg... another example of the limitations of email, its so hard to
communicate anything where nuance is essential. This discussion
would take 10 minutes in person
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IOhannes stuck [once] into the purepd library. I started that
library as a DEVELOPMENT library to explore ideas of how to implement
things in Pd. IOhannes replaced my code with [once] without asking
me. That's
hi.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IOhannes stuck [once] into the purepd library. I started that library
true
as a DEVELOPMENT library to explore ideas of how to implement things in
sorry, i had no idea you intended it like that.
i always thought that purepd would be a replacement for
On Sep 11, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I was thinking that it would be nice to have [once] accept a single
argument which would set the initial state of the object, just like
[spigot]. But this means
There are many objects that control flow. [spigot], [gate], etc.
They take float arguments. Float arguments are initialized to 0. 0
means closed in Pd.
[once] controls flow. It should take a float argument like [spigot]
and [gate] so you can choose the default state. No argument
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I was thinking that it would be nice to have [once] accept a single
argument which would set the initial state of the object, just like
[spigot]. But this means that it would have to be default closed like
spigot, breaking backwards
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, so you want to extend the tentacles of Pd's caste system further?
Abstractions for the plebe, externals for gentlemen.
It looks like you didn't read that line of mine below?
Don't accept Pd's
