On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 21:05 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > ÿÿthe solution would be to give it a name, that clearly relates to
> > gridflow. [gf.range] or whatsoever (similar to grid processing
> > classnames starting with a '#').
>
> Yes, I recentl
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
ÿÿthe solution would be to give it a name, that clearly relates to
gridflow. [gf.range] or whatsoever (similar to grid processing
classnames starting with a '#').
Yes, I recently started using the "gf." prefix for some things, first some
classes that a
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 16:05 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > sorry for late reply. i couldn't figure out, what [range] from gridflow
> > does, so it makes you difficult to have an opinion about this. the fact,
> > that it doesn't have a '#' in its n
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
sorry for late reply. i couldn't figure out, what [range] from gridflow
does, so it makes you difficult to have an opinion about this. the fact,
that it doesn't have a '#' in its name, makes me assume, that it does
something, that cannot only be applied
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 19:24 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > anyway, it seems that it has been years ago, so nevermind. i was
> > confused when trying to help someone with a patch, that uses [range],
> > which i found in /deprecated (this person was
On Jun 28, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
>> anyway, it seems that it has been years ago, so nevermind. i was
>> confused when trying to help someone with a patch, that uses [range],
>> which i found in /deprecated (this person was using pd
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Roman Haefeli wrote:
anyway, it seems that it has been years ago, so nevermind. i was
confused when trying to help someone with a patch, that uses [range],
which i found in /deprecated (this person was using pd-0.38.4-extended,
irrc). obviously, i had to think, that the orig
It is literally a copy of maxlib's [scale], with only the name changed.
.hc
On Jun 24, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 12:08 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> [range] was never part of maxlib. It was a silly kludge I think in
>> like 2002. I created it, so
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 12:08 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> [range] was never part of maxlib. It was a silly kludge I think in
> like 2002. I created it, so I decided to deprecate it.
from /externals/deprecated/range.c:
/* - range
[range] was never part of maxlib. It was a silly kludge I think in
like 2002. I created it, so I decided to deprecate it.
.hc
On Jun 24, 2008, at 2:04 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> hi all
>
> why is [range], that was initially part of maxlib, moved to
> /externals/deprecated ?
>
> who decides,
hi all
why is [range], that was initially part of maxlib, moved to
/externals/deprecated ?
who decides, what is deprecated and what not?
roman
___
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
11 matches
Mail list logo
