Re: [PD-dev] Re: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9

2006-09-11 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Mathieu Bouchard wrote: The following message from pd-cvs has no cvs log. Is this normal? isn't "Many bug fixes" a cvs log? woops, i wanted to say diff, but I did not say diff. if you are wondering, why there have been no diffs between r1.11 a

Re: [PD-dev] Re: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9

2006-09-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > > > The following message from pd-cvs has no cvs log. Is this normal? > > >> Modified Files: >> ringbuffer.c ringbuffer.h >> Log Message: >> Many bug fixes isn't "Many bug fixes" a cvs log? if you are wondering, why there have been no diffs between r1.11 and r1

[PD-dev] Re: PD-cvs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9

2006-09-10 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
The following message from pd-cvs has no cvs log. Is this normal? On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 8 Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:45:32 + From: Miller Puckette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [PD-cvs] pd/portaudio/pablio ringbuffer.c, 1.10, 1.11 ringbuffer.h, 1.1