Re: [PD-dev] Scheduling to activate control objects

2009-12-24 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, PSPunch hat gesagt: // PSPunch wrote: > However, since I could not think of any other object where the user had > to connect a metro specifically for polling, on the surface it seemed > like a lame, not elegant design. There are some examples for this approach in the msd and pmpd physi

Re: [PD-dev] Scheduling to activate control objects

2009-12-22 Thread PSPunch
Hi IOhannes, (2009/12/23 0:19), IOhannes zmölnig wrote: have a look at the "clock" functionality. Ok, so I figure I do need to dive in to code related to time management. Will do so. apart from that: why don't you just use [metro]? thus nobody has to learn how to start/stop the polling a

Re: [PD-dev] Scheduling to activate control objects

2009-12-22 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
PSPunch wrote: > Hi, > > > I am working on a control rate object which outputs a value, only when a > variable local to each instance is modified by another thread. > > Having not known how to achieve this, the object works fine, but only > with a [metro] connected to it, polling for a variable

[PD-dev] Scheduling to activate control objects

2009-12-22 Thread PSPunch
Hi, I am working on a control rate object which outputs a value, only when a variable local to each instance is modified by another thread. Having not known how to achieve this, the object works fine, but only with a [metro] connected to it, polling for a variable change on each bang. I've loo