On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Cyrille Henry wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/02/2012 09:34, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>
> and both [pix_texture] and [pix_snap] allow for asynchronous
>> DMA-transfers already (though i only added PBO-tarnsfers to [pix_snap] a
>> week ago or so).
>> it's not really docum
oh, i thought the pbo message was to use a specific pbo Id.
since it's how many PBO to use, on a specific pix_texture or pix_snap, then my
question was irrelevant.
ok for the ring buffer:
possible latency vs possible performance gain, and computer specific tuning.
i'll try that as soon as i can.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-02-29 10:52, Cyrille Henry wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/02/2012 09:34, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>
>> and both [pix_texture] and [pix_snap] allow for asynchronous
>> DMA-transfers already (though i only added PBO-tarnsfers to [pix_snap] a
>> week
Le 29/02/2012 09:34, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
and both [pix_texture] and [pix_snap] allow for asynchronous
DMA-transfers already (though i only added PBO-tarnsfers to [pix_snap] a
week ago or so).
it's not really documented anywhere (yet), but you can send a [pbo $1(
message to both these
