gt;Cc: Jonathan Wilkes ; pd-dev List
>Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 6:18 PM
>Subject: Re: [PD-dev] tkwidgets
>
>On 08/17/2011 08:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> I've started a private git branch of
>> tkwidgets that I intent to push once I get somewhere with i
On 08/17/2011 08:54 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I've started a private git branch of
tkwidgets that I intent to push once I get somewhere with it. The idea
is to try out a new idea for how GUI objects can work. Basically, I
think I can make it so that Tcl handles more of the interaction wit
On Aug 17, 2011, at 8:17 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
The problem is for a subpatch that isn't vis'd:
[inlet]
|
[checkbutton]
|
[outlet]
Will give an error on "bang" because checkbutton_bang has:
sys_vgui("%s invoke\n", x->widget_id->s_name);
That could be solved by using a -variable option, bu
The problem is for a subpatch that isn't vis'd:
[inlet]
|
[checkbutton]
|
[outlet]
Will give an error on "bang" because checkbutton_bang has:
sys_vgui("%s invoke\n", x->widget_id->s_name);
That could be solved by using a -variable option, but then that limits you
because the nonzero value cann
On Aug 17, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
How does your private git branch differ from what's currently in svn?
I pushed my git to github, my latest work is in the 'newentry'
branch. I basically focused on the [entry] widget to see if I could
get it going with this new approach
How does your private git branch differ from what's currently in svn?
One thing I'd like to point out is that your tkwidgets suffer from the same
problem tot/widget did -- by handling all the widget state in tcl you make it
impossible to use your objects inside a subpatch/abstraction that doesn't
Hey Jonathan,
I'm cc'ing pd-dev since this is a topic that could interest others and
others could contribute to. I've started a private git branch of
tkwidgets that I intent to push once I get somewhere with it. The
idea is to try out a new idea for how GUI objects can work.
Basically
