Re: [PD] status on intel core duo?

2006-12-13 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, carmen wrote: sure. but theyre single core (the dual core boost is probably 95% more performance, compared to maybe 20% for just the 64bit part) But if you're going to run pd on this, the second CPU is only for the GUI, unless you use threaded externals. Right? So, what k

Re: [PD] '*' in filenames on windows

2006-12-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
You can use the hex loader on Pd-0.39.2-extended or Pd >=0.40: [v*] would be v0x2a.dll, where 0x2a is the hex ascii code for *. This should work for compiled objects and Pd patches. .hc On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Martin Dupras wrote: I can't believe I have not noticed before now, but w

Re: [PD] open a subpatch with toxy

2006-12-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Check out the "pd-msg" docs, they are in the help browser of Pd extended: help->browser->manuals->pd-msg .hc On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:13 AM, m.weiss wrote: salut i would like to open a subpach with a specific width and height. guess this should be possible with toxy any ideas would be great

[PD] '*' in filenames on windows

2006-12-13 Thread Martin Dupras
I can't believe I have not noticed before now, but windows cannot have the character '*' in a filename.That does explain among other things why I could not unzip some example files (e.g. Patrick Sanan's MiniMoog.) I also noticed that the pix_kaleidoscope example patch uses a v* object, which does

Re: [PD] Mutiple instances of a patch at startup.

2006-12-13 Thread Miller Puckette
It's a bug... I made a decision to slightly simplify the code by reusing the "path" mechanism to open files from command line - but 'path' does, appropriately, suppress duplicates and I'd have to carry one additional flag around to do everything exactly right. I honestly didn't think anyone would

Re: [PD] status on intel core duo?

2006-12-13 Thread carmen
> >pd-0.41 (his is: the current CVS), seems to work fine on my amd64 (the > >only problems i had with earlier versions were the tables) it was freezing on launch here until start with -noaudio, then i realize the configure.in generates a script that still doesn't properly detect jack.. manually

Re: [PD] status on intel core duo?

2006-12-13 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: A bit off-topic: what's the cheapest AMD64 that you can get? Are the original generation good chips? Huh, what happened with subsequent generations? _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:

Re: [PD] status on intel core duo?

2006-12-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:36 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hola, sorry if i haven't follow all discussions on the subject, but what is the status now of pd on a 64 bits architecture? more precisely, on an intel core duo? which version needed? pd-0.41 (his is: the cur

Re: [PD] YAMIB: yet another mac intel build

2006-12-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 13, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Steffen wrote: On 13/12/2006, at 6.58, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Ok, please test the next nightly build on the Mac/Intel, 2006-12-13. There is no intel mac build from today(13th of dec). But there are two from the 12th: * Pd-0.39.2-extended-test6-macosx

Re: [PD] YAMIB: yet another mac intel build

2006-12-13 Thread Steffen
On 13/12/2006, at 15.42, Steffen wrote: On 13/12/2006, at 6.58, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Ok, please test the next nightly build on the Mac/Intel, 2006-12-13. There is no intel mac build from today(13th of dec). Wups. My bad, it might be a time-zone thing as they are there now. Any

Re: [PD] reverse & variable speed soundplayback?

2006-12-13 Thread padawan12
Without looking at your code, one way to deal with reversing is to simply invert the sign of your timeline, use a [*~ -1] following the [vline~] and add that to the size of your sample - it will then play from end to start. On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:48:47 +0100 robbert van hulzen <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [PD] reverse & variable speed soundplayback?

2006-12-13 Thread robbert van hulzen
i guess my questions were too vague--or just not challenging enough ;) with my soundfile playback & recording abs (which uses lots of the rtc [play-samp~]) (see below), i got stuck with reverse transposition (which i separated in the controls): when i play a sample in reverse, the transposition h

Re: [PD] tuning an AM radio ideas

2006-12-13 Thread nward04
Getting there now. Just what I was thinking of. Where to add in a bit of noise is the next thing. Thanks Roman On 13 Dec 2006, at 15:02, Roman Haefeli wrote: hi nick again i didn't want to 'steal' your idea, but i found this subject so interesting, that i tried to realize that approach in a

[PD] open a subpatch with toxy

2006-12-13 Thread m.weiss
salut i would like to open a subpach with a specific width and height. guess this should be possible with toxy any ideas would be great thanks gruss m.weiss ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.inf

Re: [PD] tuning an AM radio ideas

2006-12-13 Thread Kyle Klipowicz
This is a neat idea, is this how real AM works for radio? I've always enjoyed the strange 'droid' sounds that come from the blurry points in between signals on the AM dial. ~Kyle On 12/13/06, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi Nick a possibly stupid, unrealistic and very untested i

Re: [PD] tuning an AM radio ideas

2006-12-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
hi nick again i didn't want to 'steal' your idea, but i found this subject so interesting, that i tried to realize that approach in a pd-patch. the patch needs [abs~] from zexy and [lp8_butt~] from iemlib. the patch has 3 'stations' (three sources modulated on differently tuned carriers) and one '

Re: [PD] YAMIB: yet another mac intel build

2006-12-13 Thread Steffen
On 13/12/2006, at 6.58, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Ok, please test the next nightly build on the Mac/Intel, 2006-12-13. There is no intel mac build from today(13th of dec). But there are two from the 12th: * Pd-0.39.2-extended-test6-macosx104-i386 * Pd-0.39.2-extended-2006-12-12-macosx

Re: [PD] (no subject)

2006-12-13 Thread Paris Treantafeles
my two cents i'm using xorg with an nvidia graphics card and driver under debian using the "TwinView" option in my xorg file (google or other search on twinview to get all options: svideo, NTSC or PAL, etc). basically this allows me to use my laptop display to run my patches and the display to

Re: [PD] tuning an AM radio ideas

2006-12-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
hi Nick a possibly stupid, unrealistic and very untested idea comes to my mind: why not build a real AM radio in pd? in a subpatch with a very high samplingrate (using [block~]-object) you could amplitude modulate the signal you want to transmit. with a narrow band-pass filter [bp~], that is tune

Re: [PD] tuning an AM radio ideas

2006-12-13 Thread hard off
try this: [noise~ ][number box( || [expr~ pow($v1,$f2)] | [outlet~] ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] error compiling any2string

2006-12-13 Thread Miguel Cardoso
Hello list managed to compile the files on mac intel using Bryan's makefile Thanks for all the help!! ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] tuning an AM radio ideas

2006-12-13 Thread nward04
Hi all, I was just wondering would anyone here have an idea on a starting point for a patch to simulate tuning in a station on an AM radio. I want to make a virtual radio with say 5 chanels that i can tune between replete with the hissing fizzing in between out of tune bits. Thanks Nick __

Re: [PD] error compiling any2string

2006-12-13 Thread Bryan Jurish
morning all, On 2006-12-13 09:34:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> appears to have written: > > Miguel Cardoso wrote: >> >> I get this error compiling any2string.c >> >> does anyone have these moocow externals compiled for mac intel? >> > did you use "./autogen.sh && ./configure && make

Re: [PD] status on intel core duo?

2006-12-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hola, > > sorry if i haven't follow all discussions on the subject, > but what is the status now of pd > on a 64 bits architecture? > more precisely, on an intel core duo? > > which version needed? pd-0.41 (his is: the current CVS), seems to work fine on my amd64 (t

Re: [PD] error compiling any2string

2006-12-13 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Miguel Cardoso wrote: > I get this error compiling any2string.c > > does anyone have these moocow externals compiled for mac intel? > did you use "./autogen.sh && ./configure && make" or just "make"? you are trying to compile an application instead of a dylib. thinking of this, i am not sure,