Try the latest on the 10.3.9 box. I think everything but Gem works
on that.
http://idmi.poly.edu/pdlab/Pd-0.39.3-extended-rc5/
.hc
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Pagano, Patrick wrote:
Hey Hans
Got two clean macs to test on!
One is ppc 10.3.9, will RC4 work?
pp
Patrick Pagano, B.S.,
Hi Kids!
Time for a new adventure. I would like to have a working
firewire camera input for manipulation in Gem on a linux
box that is sitting here purring at me. The cam works
fine with Kino and dvgrab, so the linux-firewire connection
is all well.
But I am having no luck with pix_video or p
Yeah, strange, same for me. The PDP window pops up, but there is
nothing in it. Is gem2pdp supposed to be connected to something?
.hc
On Aug 13, 2007, at 12:30 AM, Javier García wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can see the teapot rotating but when i click the toggle, the
> image stops.
>
> how to use i
Sounds nice, I'll try soon!
.hc
On Aug 11, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> hi all
>
> netpd significantly changed. whole netpd is now only one patch,
> therefore no additional configuration is necessary, when installing
> netpd. the required pathes and libs are now loaded internally
I think it would be a good idea to change the name while fixing the
bug and kill two birds with one stone.
(FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended AFAIK).
.hc
On Aug 12, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I think it's got "declare" all over the place, but no "d
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:23 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended AFAIK).
am i right in thinking, that [declare] is included only in pd >=0.40
extended, but not in 0.39-extended?
roman
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:06 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Sounds nice, I'll try soon!
unfortunately, it won't work as promised, at least because of the
[declare] bug. but fixing means only changing the [declare] in
_chat.pd . let me know, if further changes to [declare] are required in
or
On Aug 14, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:23 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended
>> AFAIK).
>
> am i right in thinking, that [declare] is included only in pd >=0.40
> extended, but not in 0.
Hallo!
> But I am having no luck with pix_video or pdp_v4l. The main problem
> seems to be that (apparently) recently the naming conventions
> in debian and possibly linux in general were changed. So there is
> no more /dev/video0 for the v4l mode, and for pix_video trying to
> work directly with
