Hallo,
Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
One thing I wanted to ask here: Is there a special reason that pdlua
isn't using the (new in 5.1) vararg syntax with ... for methods and
maybe also in outlet(...) or similar places?
Yes. It
Hallo,
João Miguel Pais hat gesagt: // João Miguel Pais wrote:
after going through the honk abs, I saw the post
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-02/047115.html which
explains something about how this command works. I wanted to ask, is there
already any documentation
Hi,
after going through the honk abs, I saw the post
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-02/047115.html which
explains something about how this command works. I wanted to ask, is there
already any documentation about donecanvasdialog? Who is developing it,
and which features
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
One thing I wanted to ask here: Is there a special reason that pdlua
isn't using the (new in 5.1) vararg syntax with ... for methods and
maybe also in outlet(...) or similar
Hallo,
Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Yes, I see your point - but I feel the syntactic sugar is outweighed by
the other reason why I used tables instead of varargs:
Lua's default stack size is small (45 slots or so, iirc), and Pd
messages can be (almost)
what's [oscabs] ???
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
matteo sisti sette wrote:
Testing with 0.40.1 on Windows XP.
hi.
i remember the same (or very similar) behaviour a few years ago (on linux).
my base patch was very similar (random oscillators, but also controlled
oscillators) so it did not bother me too much (as i had several 100 to
1000 of
I noticed something similar on 0.40 (pure:dyne)
Something to do with DACs. I had a patch where the [dac~]
I was adding or deleteing didn't have any correspondence to
the signal it was (supposed to be) outputting.
Drives me insane, so I avoid that version now.
And it's
hard off wrote:
what's [oscabs] ???
the abtraction in the missing attachment (containing an [osc~])
mfga.sdr
IOhannes
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Andy Farnell wrote:
I noticed something similar on 0.40 (pure:dyne)
Something to do with DACs. I had a patch where the [dac~]
I was adding or deleteing didn't have any correspondence to
the signal it was (supposed to be) outputting.
i don't think it is related to [dac~].
take attached
hard off wrote:
what's [oscabs] ???
the abtraction in the missing attachment (containing an [osc~])
Oh sorry, here it is.
I had attached it, but then changed it and did something wrong when
reattaching it in google webmail (i guess I removed the attached file and
just forgot to reattach
Has anyone tried testing the font sizes on 0.41 yet? I am reviving
this good ol' font test patch to see how it's working. The [courier
10( box is a new size on Mac OS X (71x16) and it seems that the
IEMGUI font and the Pd font are not the same size. On Mac OS X, a Pd
font of 10pt
i'd love to try this - is there a makefile for linux out there?
or is there any other sql type object out there?
thanks
rob c
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Jan 4, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Johannes Kreidler wrote:
hi list,
thank you for advices and bug reports. i fixed some things, added
another abstractions und help-files.
here are the honk abstractions:
http://www.kreidler-net.de/honk.html
hans-christoph, can it be included in pd-extended?
This all makes me think that we should write a Pd book that covers
things like good form. Perhaps we could make it a decentralized
collaborative effort with strange consensus decisionmaking to mirror
the Pd community :D
.hc
On Jan 12, 2008, at 8:41 AM, Jamie Bullock wrote:
On Fri,
On Jan 27, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
marius schebella schrieb:
let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every
other program on my computer?
Yes, I also don't understand this ...
Although there might be a workaround, newbies (and even me as not
so new
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:02:36 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That way you can turn it on only when you are performing,
for example. Then it would be useful.
Here's the nub of it. Performance vs programming. As someone else
who does both I can agree the feature is a
FYI: Pd-extended uses cyclone's [counter] by default, which is Max/
MSP compatible.
.hc
On Jan 9, 2008, at 12:27 PM, hard off wrote:
for a long time i've been an advocate of the [f ]x[+ 1] method of
counting in pd cos it's a good basic introduction to hot and cold
inlets and basic object
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Has anyone tried testing the font sizes on 0.41 yet? I am reviving this
good ol' font test patch to see how it's working. The [courier 10( box is
a new size on Mac OS X (71x16) and it seems that the IEMGUI font and the
Pd font are not the same size. On Mac
Two books that helped me learn how to write clearly modularized programs
were Starting Forth (1981) and, especially, Thinking Forth (1984) by Leo
Brodie. Of course, these are for a particular language, and one which
encourages -- you might even say requires -- modularization. But a lot
of
nothing is bad about using shift.
but the question is, how pd should behave if your are NOT using shift,
but click on the small X in the pd console window title bar (or a patch)
that usually closes a patch or program without confirmation. (unless you
haven't changed the document.)
new users may
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:02 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
marius schebella schrieb:
let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every
other program on my computer?
Sounds useful to me, but perhaps a bit excessive. I think it would
be more useful to be able to hide the whole Pd window on Mac OS X,
but that would be trickier to program, given the Pd code.
.hc
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:28 PM, marius schebella wrote:
hey,
the whole quitting discussion
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Has anyone tried testing the font sizes on 0.41 yet? I am
reviving this good ol' font test patch to see how it's working.
The [courier 10( box is a new size on Mac OS X (71x16) and it
seems that the
--consistency. #1 rule for interface design... yea!
marius.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:02 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
marius schebella schrieb:
let
Using an old topic title, I have this problem: when finally I've configured
Jack and reduced Xruns, now is PD that makes noises and lots of DIO Errors. Is
there something I must combine for both to work properly?
_
Cansado de
26 matches
Mail list logo
