Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Andy Farnell
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:38:46 -0500 Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:37:06AM +, Andy Farnell wrote: > > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:27:32 -0500 > > Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andy Farnell wrote: > > > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500 > > >

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Chris McCormick
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:37:06AM +, Andy Farnell wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:27:32 -0500 > Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andy Farnell wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500 > > > Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, we're clear on that. I was responding

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Andy Farnell
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:27:32 -0500 Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andy Farnell wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500 > > Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote: > >> > >>> As I see, the unipolar

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Martin Peach
Andy Farnell wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500 > Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote: >> >>> As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there >>> is a chemical reaction that removes

Re: [PD] FEEDBACK

2008-02-06 Thread Andy Farnell
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:50:38 +0100 "jörg brinkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NOTHING... > > whats so special about the macbook preamp ? or is m-audio just lame ? AGC, AKA automatic gain control. The preamp is carefully balancing the audio signal at just the right level for you to get feedbac

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Andy Farnell
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500 Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote: > > As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there > > is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere,

Re: [PD] Trying to figure out why video in Gem is running soooo slow

2008-02-06 Thread jim
Thanks for the response Roman. It has been very helpful. I have an Nvidia card. But yes I get the same results, when I frst create the Gem window I only see a portion of the image . Thanks to your suggestion I closed it and when I re-open it the full image is mapped onto the rectangle and it runs m

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Chris McCormick
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote: > As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there > is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere, > (and one assumes no matter is transformed to energy) - well NO2 and O3 > are prod

[PD] FEEDBACK

2008-02-06 Thread jörg brinkmann
hello, i really twist my mind over this for a longer time... i tried many different buildups but nothing worked so far :( this is what i did: i built a very simple patch of a selfcontrolled feedback in pd the things i use: -macbook pro -pd -2 piezos (mics) soldered on a cables with jacks -metal

Re: [PD] [OT] New machine - sound hardware?

2008-02-06 Thread altern
Ed Kelly(e)k dio: > > Hi Enrike > > > I have a terratec phase X24 and the only problem I have is because of > > the firewire controller on my laptop (IBM X32) which seems to be crap (a > > Ricoh). So it is not the soundcard. I was told on the freebob list that > > I should buy a PCMCIA firewi

Re: [PD] Trying to figure out why video in Gem is running soooo slow

2008-02-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
hi jim i am not sure, but to me it sounds similar to this issue of gem's bug tracker: [1] http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1771966&group_id=64325&atid=507079 not sure again, but this seems to be related as well: [2] http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&ai

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Kyle Klipowicz
Yes. A rapid expansion and collapse of air pressure would most definitely be inseparable causes. ~Kyle On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes. That's part of it. > > According to Ribner and Roys first paper the vacuum collapse model > is refuted - we

[PD] ngrid....?

2008-02-06 Thread bryan eubanks
hello. I recently found [ngrid]. I'm an artist, not a programmer, and this tool seems like something I want to modify into my set up, but I can't find much about it except the source code in the cvs repository which I can't work with. I am hoping someone on here can inform me further, maybe someone

Re: [PD] [OT] New machine - sound hardware?

2008-02-06 Thread Ed Kelly
Hi Enrike > I have a terratec phase X24 and the only problem I have is because of > the firewire controller on my laptop (IBM X32) which seems to be crap (a > Ricoh). So it is not the soundcard. I was told on the freebob list that > I should buy a PC

Re: [PD] hover info

2008-02-06 Thread beau
just an idea for helping people learn pd, but while not add hover info for each object. This would be some info about each object so that if you turn the mode on and then hover your mouse over the object a window pops up that tells you something about how it works? ~B/ www.cypod.co.nr __

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Andy Farnell
Yes. That's part of it. According to Ribner and Roys first paper the vacuum collapse model is refuted - well, they don't use that exact word - more like they suggest it is replaced... "As recently as the late 1800's, four theories of thunder were in competition: The vacuum collapse theory, the

Re: [PD] pd thunder

2008-02-06 Thread Peter Plessas
* Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-05 23:33]: > > > You're spot on there. I will develop the stereo image as I work on > the environment model. > > But interestingly enough, lightning _is_ an explosion, one hell of > a big explosion. The plasma is as hot as the Sun for an instant and >

Re: [PD] send a message to [pd $0-subpatch] ?

2008-02-06 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, tim hat gesagt: // tim wrote: > how can I send a message like [obj 120 $1table $2( to a subpatch named > [pd $0-subpatch] ? http://puredata.info/docs/tutorials/TipsAndTricks#getting-0-into-messages > I tried: > > [obj 120 $1 table $2( > | > [s pd-$0-subpatch] > > but the $0 in there i

Re: [PD] send a message to [pd $0-subpatch] ?

2008-02-06 Thread hard off
oops. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] send a message to [pd $0-subpatch] ?

2008-02-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
hard off wrote: > anyway $0 won't work inside a message box. while this is true in general it doesn't apply here, as tim's example uses [s pd-$0-subpatch] (no message-box involved in the problematic code) tim: your problem is most likely related to an outdated version of Pd you are using. sin

[PD] Filtering Midi Active Sensing

2008-02-06 Thread Ingo Scherzinger
>Anybody aware of modules which help me filter active sensing data ? I dont >think I need it >and do not want to flood the wires or destination systems > >Also, perhaps, libraries with more midi functions ? > >Regards, >Frans I actually need the opposit of what Frans needs. I need anything t