Re: [PD] [pix_record] mixes up colors.

2008-03-01 Thread simon wise
On 1 Mar 2008, at 3:51 PM, Dudley Brooks wrote: > It's worth trying ... I guess. It has the obvious disadvantage of > saving hundreds or even thousands of files which some other program > then > has to convert into a movie. So if anyone knows how to modify either > pix_record or its inputs ..

[PD] Pd-0.41-2.msw.exe is missing [expr]

2008-03-01 Thread David F. Place
It occurred to me that installing pd on my Windows XP professional computer may be working by accident. I installed it over an earlier version of Pd, so it might be using the earlier version of the [expr] library. Deleting my pd directory and reinstalling proved my conjecture. Bug: If

[PD] Improved bug report: [expr] on Windows 2000 (XP non-professional)

2008-03-01 Thread David F. Place
Hi: Yesterday, I rather vaguely reported a bug I encountered on my friends Windows XP non-pro machine. I have been able to reproduce it on my Windows 2000 machine. Windows 2000 5.00.2195 Service Pack 4 Pd 0.41-2 downloaded from SourceForge 1. Download and install Pd. 2. Run pd.exe in the bi

Re: [PD] flv sound

2008-03-01 Thread marius schebella
hey, ok, the codec is common, but does that mean I can load it directly into a table? or play it with pdp_qt~ or mp3play~, because none of them is working (Layer not supported/not a quicktime file). Or do I have to extract/convert audio with mplayer or vlc before I can use it with pd? marius. c

Re: [PD] hilbert~ troubles in Pd-extended?

2008-03-01 Thread Steffen Leve Poulsen
Hi Hans. Its seems that [hilbert~] and [complex-mod~] is missing in Pd-0.39.3-extended for windows. mvh/Steffen Leve Poulsen Hans-Christoph Steiner skrev: > Hey all, > > Miller just mentioned there are troubles with [hilbert~] in Pd- > extended. Anyone know the details? I just tried the he