[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How is it possible to make-XML files useable in Pd.
> e.g for controlling
maybe [pool] ?
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi David,
quick late night idea: write to two tables and overlap them with a
crossfade by 5-10 ms or so. I think your time-triggered ramps at the
start and end points of the loop are still a good idea anyhow. If you
are doing any kind of resynthesis of the recorded sounds, you might be
interes
Hi,
I would like to reply with a couple of suggestions:
Have you thought about another technique? instead of making several
[select]s with lots of variables (which will have to be checked now and
then, as we don't know fow now which version of vanilla was your reference
version), you could
Sounds like a good case for a FAQ entry.
http://puredata.info/docs/faq
.hc
On Jul 6, 2008, at 2:06 AM, Andy Farnell wrote:
>
> I noticed this message on a public music related forum.
>
> "been thinking of trying pure data again as last time i downloaded it
> it infected my computer with a blad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Aaargh... I was looking at an older version of [unpackOSC], before it
>> was modified (zmoelnig's patch 1959417). I guess the best solution is to
>
> sorry if i caused confusion here.
>
No problem, I had forgotten about t
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm getting the feeling that list is becoming deprecated in favour of
> > meta-messages, since the 'list' selector is redundant. Is that right?
>
> no, it's just something different.
Quoting Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hallo,
> marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
>
>> In case I wanted to use Gem, besides from including the license, would I
>> also have to include the Gem sourcecode in the package?
>
> Alternatively you can provide a written offer
Quoting Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Aaargh... I was looking at an older version of [unpackOSC], before it
> was modified (zmoelnig's patch 1959417). I guess the best solution is to
sorry if i caused confusion here.
> make [pipelist] accept lists without the list selector (aka
> meta-me
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote:
>
>> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>> Hallo,
>>> Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote:
>>>
Strange I don't get that using Pd 0.40.3-extended-20080308, just using
the packOSC-help and routeOSC-help patc
Hallo,
Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote:
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote:
> >
> >> Strange I don't get that using Pd 0.40.3-extended-20080308, just using
> >> the packOSC-help and routeOSC-help patches. I think maybe different
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> But anyway routeOSC also outputs meta-messages unless you have
> messages starting with a number (which are autoconverted to lists by
> Pd).
Oh, and I actually think, [routeOSC] is right to do so, as it's
compatible with [OSCroute] th
11 matches
Mail list logo
