Roman Haefeli wrote:
hm.. only now, i see that overriding built-ins seems to be intentional.
yes, this has been calimed to be a feature:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2008-06/011846.html
i still don't believe it really is.
it might be better to add an explicit way to override
Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi all, hi IOhannes
after having installed pd 0.42.0test5, i assumed to have discovered a
behaviour change of [unpack] and [pack], until i noticed:
a) zexy comes with its own version of [pack] and [unpack].
why are they called the same? i really don't get that.
Hallo,
Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
Can this fix be applied to [polypoly] as well?
No.
Because it already is. ;)
Ciao
--
Frank
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Max wrote:
hi,
i had almost the same situation last week. a class with mainly beginners
but some had knowledge in max or pd. to illustrate the basic differences
i gave them those patches, feel free to use them (comments are in german).
cute image, thanks
--
damian stewart | skype:
Ah, a preemptive enhancement, as it were. I vaguely wondered why I
never had any trouble with [loadbang] and [polypoly].
Thanks, Frank.
Phil
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
Can this fix be applied to [polypoly] as well?
No.
Hallo,
Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
Ah, a preemptive enhancement, as it were. I vaguely wondered why I
never had any trouble with [loadbang] and [polypoly].
Yep, I just forgot to include the same fix to nqpoly4 so I'm also
responsibe that Hans made another workaround. But now
Inspired by the recent NYC effort, I thought I'd reach out to patchers in
the L.A. area.
I know there are swarms of Max/MSP people out here, but I'd be interested to
see if any of the pd-list lurkers are my neighbors.
Cal-Arts rats?
Anyone?
JN
___
Thanks Jamie,
Indeed those objects were very helpful at this stage.
Now I need to do something a little more complex which may need to
perform better than unpacking to a list for calcs...
I need to calculate the sum of the differences between two tables (768
elements each).
I suppose the
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 09:49 -0800, B. Bogart wrote:
I need to calculate the sum of the differences between two tables (768
elements each).
Does the attached do what you want?
BTW, I also sometimes yearn things like tables of lists etc, but OTOH, I
wonder if trying to impose paradigms from
Well, what I want to be able to do is put max-compatible objects into Pd
vanilla (such as gate and scale) without breaking libraries. However, I
didn't realize there were libraries out there that named things the same as
Pd built-ins, with the intention of not ever getting instantiated under
the
hi hans,
any news on this?
i tried to link to the intrepid repository for pd-extended today and
no luck :-(
as i am quite new to linux, i don´t know, what one would have to do,
to get it compiling.
chris wenn´s bloody hack mentioned earlier here:
Dunno about others, but I'd be up for running up to LA once in a while
to meet Pd users.
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:33:45AM -0800, Joe Newlin wrote:
Inspired by the recent NYC effort, I thought I'd reach out to patchers in
the L.A. area.
I know there are swarms of Max/MSP
I'm building a gui scroll menu in pd-vanilla with some cnv's. Looking at the
cnv properties window, I see that next to visible_rectangle height/width it
says it's measured in pixels.
But a default cnv with height = 60 creates a cnv that in fact is 61 pixels
high. (same problem for width, too)
13 matches
Mail list logo
