many thanks for the explanation !
--- On Thu, 2/5/09, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> From: Frank Barknecht
> Subject: Re: [PD] preset system for complex gem patches
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, February 5, 2009, 2:32 PM
> Hallo,
> punchik punchik hat gesagt: // punchik punchik wrote:
>
>
Hallo,
punchik punchik hat gesagt: // punchik punchik wrote:
> Hi, ive been working on a complex gem patch for creating 3d
> structures, the patch has a lot of parameters for changing translation
> , rotation, scale, color, etc. I want to make a preset system for
> saving the states of interesting
Definitely not coll. Look at sssad or mememto, or maybe pool. There
is also Mike McGonagle's sqlite object if you want a full database.
.hc
On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:29 PM, punchik punchik wrote:
> Hi, ive been working on a complex gem patch for creating 3d
> structures, the patch has a lot of
Hi, ive been working on a complex gem patch for creating 3d structures, the
patch has a lot of parameters for changing translation , rotation, scale,
color, etc. I want to make a preset system for saving the states of interesting
shapes and then load them, Do anybody have tried something like th
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 18:12 +0100, Jack wrote:
> Thanx Roman for the clarification. I thought that [tcpsend]/
> [tcpreceive] worked with OSC.
> I think it must be specify somewhere in the help patch (with
> [packOSC]/[unpackOSC] or/and [tcpsend]/[tcpreceive] ?).
> I just download abstractions fr
Rory Walsh wrote:
> [...]
read about $0.
it does exactly what you want without having to dynamically change anything.
just use "$0-tgl-1" as a send/receive name in each abstractions and be
happy.
fgmadsr
IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
I keep running into problem with an abstraction I'm trying to
implement. Let me first explain what I'm trying to do. I have an
abstraction that has 16 tgls in a row. These are graphed on parent so
they they can be altered from the main patch. When a user clicks on of
the tgls it changes colour. Thi
Hallo,
Rapha?l ILIAS hat gesagt: // Rapha?l ILIAS wrote:
> I'm thinking about a way to produce a short table which would sum up a sound
> table. This might be a way to prevent audioclicks when displaying a huge
> wavetable, or an idea to be able "zoom" on a part of the table. I tried the
> firs
Thanx Roman for the clarification. I thought that [tcpsend]/
[tcpreceive] worked with OSC.
I think it must be specify somewhere in the help patch (with
[packOSC]/[unpackOSC] or/and [tcpsend]/[tcpreceive] ?).
I just download abstractions from :
http://romanhaefeli.net/software/pd/OSCstream.tar.gz
Hi !
I'm thinking about a way to produce a short table which would sum up a sound
table. This might be a way to prevent audioclicks when displaying a huge
wavetable, or an idea to be able "zoom" on a part of the table. I tried the
first method that came to my mind : just to play the sample while
--- Jack schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009:
> Yep, as Roman says try [udpreceive] with [unpackOSC] (OSC
> comme often
> 'on' UDP) or [tcpreceive] with [unpackOSC], if you
> want a service
> with connection. The choice depends if you absolutely need
> to receive
> your data.
> AFAIK, OSCx accepts o
I think the problem is "server side" processing couldn't open a
socket... :P:P
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> mbutubuntu wrote:
>> JacK, I know... packOSC works, but udpsend doesn't connect, neither
>> tcpsend...
>>
>
> highly unlikely.
> show your patch :-)
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
_
mbutubuntu wrote:
JacK, I know... packOSC works, but udpsend doesn't connect, neither
tcpsend...
highly unlikely.
show your patch :-)
fgmasdr
IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRI
Ah, ok :)
Have you open [routeOSC] and [packOSC] in mrpeach ?
Click on [connect 127.0.0.1 9997( message, you must have in the
console :
udpsend: connecting to port 9997
Then click on [send /test/one/two/three zz 88 T( message, you must
have in the console :
print: /test/one/two/three zz 88 T
er
JacK, I know... packOSC works, but udpsend doesn't connect, neither
tcpsend...
Jack wrote:
> If you use OSC, you need [packOSC] before [udpsend]. See the help
> patch of [packOSC] in mrpeach.
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>
> Le 5 févr. 09 à 16:12, mbutubuntu a écrit :
>
>> thanks... udpreceive wors wery wel
If you use OSC, you need [packOSC] before [udpsend]. See the help
patch of [packOSC] in mrpeach.
++
Jack
Le 5 févr. 09 à 16:12, mbutubuntu a écrit :
> thanks... udpreceive wors wery well but udpsend
> doesn't... :P:P
>
>
>
> Jack wrote:
>> Yep, as Roman says try [udpreceive] with [u
thanks... udpreceive wors wery well but udpsend doesn't... :P:P
Jack wrote:
> Yep, as Roman says try [udpreceive] with [unpackOSC] (OSC comme often
> 'on' UDP) or [tcpreceive] with [unpackOSC], if you want a service with
> connection. The choice depends if you absolutely need to receiv
Yep, as Roman says try [udpreceive] with [unpackOSC] (OSC comme often
'on' UDP) or [tcpreceive] with [unpackOSC], if you want a service
with connection. The choice depends if you absolutely need to receive
your data.
AFAIK, OSCx accepts only UDP protocol.
++
Jack
Le 5 févr. 09 à 14:15, Rom
what about netsend~ vs nstream~ ???
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Chris McCormick wrote:
Attached is a concrete example of this for your specific use case. It
allows you to run arbitrary commands on your shell and get the results
back into Pd. I know you said that this seems messy to you, but I feel
that Claude's way is actually quite elegant.
Untar the attach
--- mbutubuntu schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009:
> hello folks, I'm using OSC to send information from
> Processing to Pd...
> I started writing my "receiving" Patch in a
> Computer where was Installed
> Ubuntu 8.04 and Pd-extended 0.40.3 in stalled by the .deb
> package, my
> laptop was an Archlinu
hello folks, I'm using OSC to send information from Processing to Pd...
I started writing my "receiving" Patch in a Computer where was Installed
Ubuntu 8.04 and Pd-extended 0.40.3 in stalled by the .deb package, my
laptop was an Archlinux "client" in which Processing was running...
Processing s
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:26:13PM +, Rob Canning wrote:
> (it would be really nice to have an object for communicating with the
> shell that is not buggy.)
[snip]
> also this method is fine for sending stuff to the shell but what about
> getting results back from the shell? like a bang whe
23 matches
Mail list logo
