[PD] search in archive broken?

2010-10-20 Thread marius schebella
hi, searching in the list archives I am getting results, but most of them do not contain the search terms. http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/ marius. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.pureda

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] Another Feature Extraction Library

2010-10-20 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hi Adriano, congratulations, wonderful library and you've free'd me of the laborious task of doing it myself as I had intended to since LAC2010. :) Ciao -- Frank On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 07:57:56PM -0200, Adriano Monteiro wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm writing to make available to you a feature ext

Re: [PD] overdriven speaker

2010-10-20 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Martin Schied wrote: It shouldn't be too hard to do this integration with basic pole / zero objects. A problem using integration only is the lack of mechanical damping. A real speaker goes back to x=0 if no signal is present. A simple integrator doesn't right. That's why

Re: [PD] overdriven speaker

2010-10-20 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Martin Schied wrote: The peak output voltage of the amplifier is equal for all frequencies and defines the maximum acceleration the cone can experience. So we can say the acceleration is Alright, I should have thought about it. I mean, it's great that you wrote it, and i

Re: [PD] overdriven speaker

2010-10-20 Thread Martin Schied
It shouldn't be too hard to do this integration with basic pole / zero objects. A problem using integration only is the lack of mechanical damping. A real speaker goes back to x=0 if no signal is present. A simple integrator doesn't - so the 'simulated' cone would just fly away slowly. So som

Re: [PD] overdriven speaker

2010-10-20 Thread Martin Schied
Hi! Sorry for answering this late. And I was wrong in my last mail. The signal doesn't have to be differentiated but integrated (like you already did in your first post).? The signal in pd represents the current flowing through the speaker's coil (if we assume it isn't capacitive or inducti

Re: [PD] soft-edging with multiple projectors/GEM

2010-10-20 Thread news
Hello! Well, the softedge/overlap is quite useful in installations, since projectors sometimes have the bad habit of moving slightly, even when installed as proper as possible. If i do it Hard edged, meaning that the borders of the single images are exactly edge to edge this would lead to a gap

Re: [PD] soft-edging with multiple projectors/GEM

2010-10-20 Thread Pagano, Patrick
Why do you need overlap if you are going to use a triplehead2Go? -Original Message- From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of n...@petervenus.de Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 5:58 PM To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: [PD] soft-edging with multiple projectors/

[PD] [PD-announce] Another Feature Extraction Library

2010-10-20 Thread Adriano Monteiro
Hi list, I'm writing to make available to you a feature extraction library that I implemented as abstractions in PD It can be useful for people who are also studying this subject and other things related to it. Here is the google site with the library attached for download: https://sites.google

[PD] soft-edging with multiple projectors/GEM

2010-10-20 Thread news
Hello List! I have a question regarding the work with multiple projectors: I am looking for solution within Pd/Gem to process the output in the GEMwindow in a way, that i can work with a TripleHead2Go fullscreen and to be able to set up the 3 Projectors with an overlap. I know that there are some

Re: [PD] bpm counter

2010-10-20 Thread patko
Hello, I'm working on a bpm counter for soundfiles only, and get an high percentage of good results with little drums loops. This patch detects only binary rythms, maybe it will be possible to make this realtime... - "L.J." a écrit : > before building something that's already there, ha

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 20/10/10 16:20, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? I'm still pretty much just using [delread~] an

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Matthew Logan
I like Anton Hörnquist's [jon~], "a reverb abstraction based on the algorithm in this article by Jon Dattorro: http://www.stanford.edu/~dattorro/EffectDesignPart1.pdf " IMO, it is easy to use and sounds very good. Here's the link: http://www.hornquist.se/pd/jon Matt Logan On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? I'm still pretty much just using [delread~] and [vd~], with multipliers like [*~ 0.95] a

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Paulo Casaes
There's Ben Saylor's partconv~ which does some fancy convolving. It's in the browser in PD-Extended. p On 20/10/2010 09:26, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or ex

Re: [PD] Res: pduino + arduino UNO

2010-10-20 Thread alessandro contini
you're right, sorry. when i had the chance to work on my student's computer again i re-installed EVERYTHING and it works fine. i'm sorry i've used the list for a student's fault (maybe), but first time i was remotely connected with his screen and everything seemed in its right place... anyway, whe

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? I find [rev2~] and [rev3~] in extended pretty interesting. If you're on linux and have ladspa C* JVRev is also ni

[PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread ronni montoya
Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? Thanks R. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://

Re: [PD] [GEM] compilation error in fedora13

2010-10-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-10-20 03:29, Jaime Oliver wrote: > hi iohannes, thanks for your reply > > > any ideas? > it seems like the macros are not properly found. make sure you: - have the file "src/m4/gem.m4" (this file holds the macros you seem to be missing) - have correctly run: $ cd /Gem/src && ./auto