Re: [PD] Android device for PdDroidParty

I've used PdDroidParty with a Samsung Galaxy, and while the audio latency is noticeable, the overall sound is decent, the touch interface is responsive and everything seems to work fine. JN On Dec 29, 2011, at 9:10 AM, batinste wrote: > Hi PDers > > I'd rather avoid iStuff when it's possible

Re: [PD] ofxKinect - pure data (Windows 7)

OSC messages, plain Pd-style FUDI messages via a network socket, or try ofxPd. .hc On Dec 29, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Philipp Wartenberg wrote: > Hello, > > I worked out how to use the kinect under windows 7 with the openframworks > addon ofxKinect. Now I do not know how to get the data from openfr

[PD] PhD

sorry. this time nothing about PD nor PDP, instead i am collecting information about a PhD. i would be thankful, if anybody has an advice on a postgraduate academic degree somehow related to the following fields: *realtime motion capture *augmented reality applications for mobile devices *3D appl

[PD] ofxKinect - pure data (Windows 7)

Hello, I worked out how to use the kinect under windows 7 with the openframworks addon ofxKinect. Now I do not know how to get the data from openframworks to puredata. Does anyone on the list uses the kinect with puredata on windows? Regards. ___ Pd-lis

[PD] Android device for PdDroidParty

Hi PDers I'd rather avoid iStuff when it's possible, but the fact that TouchOSC lacks some important features on Android led me to consider buying an used ipod touch to fiddle wirelessly with pd. Then I remembered of PdDroidParty. Basically one can at least mimic TouchOSC main feature with it

Re: [PD] Android device for PdDroidParty

what about that then ? http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2011-07/089755.html Le 29/12/2011 18:44, Bastiaan van den Berg a écrit : On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 18:10, batinste > wrote: Hi PDers I'd rather avoid iStuff when it's possible, but the fact tha

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-1 test7 (!) available

The challenge remains, though, regardless of the approach. If a particular call was called and it shouldn't have, parsing it out as part of a paragraph or a line makes no difference performance-wise, but it sure does make a world of a difference in terms of gui (or parts of it) becoming unr

Re: [PD] autocompletion bug report

On 12/28/2011 11:59 PM, olivier gailly wrote: hello, this plugin seems great but i have a problem installing it : UNHANDLED ERROR: version conflict for package "Tcl": have 8.4, need 8.5 while executing "package require Tcl 8.5" ("uplevel" body line 27) invoked from within "upleve