Re: [PD] Too many objects (but only in Windows)

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-04 05:38, Ed Kelly wrote: > Thanks IOhannes, So there is some sloppiness in Windows, which is > hardly a surprise since it's not created with the integrity of a > *nix system. to be honest, this is not an "integrity-defeating sloppiness" in

Re: [PD] Pd-extended on the Raspberry Pi

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-04 04:37, Epic Jefferson wrote: > Other than being crazy small, i encountered a problem with your > instructions. > > when i entered: debuild -uc -us "-bash: debuild: command not > found" # aptitude install devscripts debian lacks the

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread Ed Kelly
I think you can't fix a bug in a core object and retain complete backwards compatibility in terms of the audio result of old patches, unless you implement a "pre-0.44 mode" or something. But why would you want to do that? Perhaps a method can be used to switch between the two modes in hip~, but

Re: [PD] Too many objects (but only in Windows)

2012-10-03 Thread Ed Kelly
> On 2012-10-03 15:06, Ed Kelly wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I know you main devs have bigger fish to fry right now, but an >> answer to (some of) my wierdness with Gem (in case you're >> interested) -- the "unable to save file: too many objects" message, >> and related errors (files no longer loaded

Re: [PD] Pd-extended on the Raspberry Pi

2012-10-03 Thread Epic Jefferson
Other than being crazy small, i encountered a problem with your instructions. when i entered: debuild -uc -us "-bash: debuild: command not found" almost there. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > 128.238.56.50 is gone forever. Its been temporarily replaced by >

Re: [PD] getting sample rate of file loaded into an array

2012-10-03 Thread Rick T
Thanks On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Patrice Colet wrote: > [ext13/wavinfo] > > or more complicated for the fun, with [mrpeach/binfile] and > https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/422/projects/WaveFormat/ > > it's attached ^^ > > Colet Patrice > > - Mail original - > > De: "Rick T" > > À

Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 and Openbox

2012-10-03 Thread Simon Wise
On 04/10/12 04:07, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Sounds like this should actually be: set x [ expr max($x % $screenwidth - $::windowframex, 0)] set y [ expr max($y % $screenheight - $::windowframey, 0)] That would ensure that x and y are always>= 0. Does changing that in pdtk_canvas.tcl solve

Re: [PD] getting sample rate of file loaded into an array

2012-10-03 Thread Patrice Colet
[ext13/wavinfo] or more complicated for the fun, with [mrpeach/binfile] and https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/422/projects/WaveFormat/ it's attached ^^ Colet Patrice - Mail original - > De: "Rick T" > À: "PD List" > Envoyé: Jeudi 4 Octobre 2012 00:26:15 > Objet: [PD] getting sample

[PD] getting sample rate of file loaded into an array

2012-10-03 Thread Rick T
Greetings All I load a wavefile into an array using openpanel but how can I go about getting the sample rate of the wav file? I'm trying to load the sample rate data into an expr object Example: expr (sample rate) / f$1 Aloha Rick ___ Pd-list@iem.at ma

Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 and Openbox

2012-10-03 Thread Nicola Pandini
Il 03/10/2012 22:07, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: On 10/03/2012 03:47 PM, Nicola Pandini wrote: Il 03/10/2012 18:44, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: On 10/03/2012 07:49 AM, Nicola Pandini wrote: Il 02/10/2012 16:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: The problem is caused by how Tk a

[PD] Namespaces (was Re: array size (was Re: arraysize))

2012-10-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
When someone decides to implement this, please kill two birds with one stone by having a look at Tim Blechmann's "bindable objects" scope from Nova: http://tim.klingt.org/publications/tim_blechmann_nova.pdf   (2.1.4, p. 16)   In my limited understanding this is _exactly_ the system you want for nam

Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 and Openbox

2012-10-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On 10/03/2012 03:47 PM, Nicola Pandini wrote: > Il 03/10/2012 18:44, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: >> On 10/03/2012 07:49 AM, Nicola Pandini wrote: >>> Il 02/10/2012 16:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: The problem is caused by how Tk and X11 measures window frames: it measures

Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 and Openbox

2012-10-03 Thread Nicola Pandini
Il 03/10/2012 18:44, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: On 10/03/2012 07:49 AM, Nicola Pandini wrote: Il 02/10/2012 16:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: The problem is caused by how Tk and X11 measures window frames: it measures it including all of the chrome around the window (the button/

[PD] [PD-announce] pd berlin meeting 4. october c-base

2012-10-03 Thread Malte Steiner
PD Berlin meetings are from now at C-Base (Rungestrasse 20 Berlin) every first and third thursday in the month beginning 20:00, the next one is 4.October. Looking forward to it and thanks C-Base for hosting us. Send me a email or post here for further questions... http://puredata.info/community/

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
For the hip~ problem, I'm fine with just fixing it in 0.44, leaving it as hip~, and being done with it. I agree with Jonathan: the default behavior should be the non-buggy behavior. The issue I am addressing is the -pre-0.44-hip idea and other ideas for providing backwards compatibility. Namesp

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 17:43, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: Miller Puckette To: Cyrille Henry >> Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Wednesday, October 3, >> 2012 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize) >> >> Pr

Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 and Openbox

2012-10-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On 10/03/2012 07:49 AM, Nicola Pandini wrote: > Il 02/10/2012 16:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: >> >> The problem is caused by how Tk and X11 measures window frames: it >> measures it including all of the chrome around the window (the >> button/title bar on the top, any framing on the botto

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - > From: Miller Puckette > To: Cyrille Henry > Cc: pd-list@iem.at > Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 11:03 AM > Subject: Re: [PD] array size (was Re:  arraysize) > > Problem is, it's a bug - I want to fix it :)   Please allow the users that want non-buggy behavior t

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread Miller Puckette
Problem is, it's a bug - I want to fix it :) M On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:44:47AM +0200, Cyrille Henry wrote: > hello, > > since externals can override internals, why not leaving hip~ untouched, and > providing a corrected hip~ that is installed in pd/extra/0.44 > one can just remove path > 0.4

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 02/10/12 16:15, Miller Puckette wrote: 1. there's a bug in hip~ - its DC gain is slightly (and possibly considerably) greater than 1. Did you mean nyquist-frequency rather than DC here? IIRC DC gain for hip~ should be 0 or very close to it and nyquist-frequency gain 1. I did notice that de

Re: [PD] Too many objects (but only in Windows)

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 15:06, Ed Kelly wrote: > Hi list, > > I know you main devs have bigger fish to fry right now, but an > answer to (some of) my wierdness with Gem (in case you're > interested) -- the "unable to save file: too many objects" message, > and

Re: [PD] Pdsend on Raspbian...

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 13:55, Pierre Massat wrote: > Thanks for your help, it worked. I hadn't actually installed Pd. I > used "apt-get install pd" (it only installed puredata-core), > instead of "apt-get install puredata". ah, i was wondering about that. any

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread i go bananas
woahhang on you did that patch without seeing mine??? it's almost identical...right down to the numbers in the example message box someone call Fox Mulder! this is definitely an X file ! ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-m

Re: [PD] Pdsend on Raspbian...

2012-10-03 Thread Pierre Massat
Thanks for your help, it worked. I hadn't actually installed Pd. I used "apt-get install pd" (it only installed puredata-core), instead of "apt-get install puredata". Cheers, Pierre. 2012/10/1 IOhannes m zmölnig > On 10/01/2012 08:51 PM, Pierre Massat wrote: > > Dear List, > > > > I had to for

Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 and Openbox

2012-10-03 Thread Nicola Pandini
Il 02/10/2012 16:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: The problem is caused by how Tk and X11 measures window frames: it measures it including all of the chrome around the window (the button/title bar on the top, any framing on the bottom, etc.) The window framing/chrome varies a lot depen

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
On 03/10/12 13:32, i go bananas wrote: nice Lorenzo ! Thanks.. well actually for the float version I think we had the same idea :) ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread i go bananas
nice Lorenzo ! ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Preset system in pd?

2012-10-03 Thread Cyrille Henry
Le 01/10/2012 00:53, flad chester a écrit : Hi, i was wondering if somebody have done any preset system for pd? are there any library or examples patches of this? I would like to store all the values of my sliders and the recover them interpolating between them. have a look at pbank. it's o

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
Hi the attached should do it... The version on the right should be more general allowing to specify the grouping size, and would work with non-necessarily-numeric list. Lorenzo On 03/10/12 11:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to get pairs of two out of a list using two [lis

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > >> But if my list has an odd number of elements, then I lose the >> last one, don't I? no. that's what the last outlet of [list split] is for. On 2012-10-03 11:58, Alexandros Drymoni

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
It does. Thanks a lot. On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:00 PM, i go bananas wrote: > not sure if there is a super simple way to do this, but this patch looks > like it works: > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread i go bananas
not sure if there is a super simple way to do this, but this patch looks like it works: list_pair.pd Description: Binary data ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
Plus, the pairs I get with [list split 2] are 1 2 3 4 where I want to get 1 2 2 3 3 4 and if my list has got 5 elements 4 5 in the end.. On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > But if my list has an odd number of elements, then I lose the last one, > don't I? > > On Wed, O

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
But if my list has an odd number of elements, then I lose the last one, don't I? On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:45 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2012-10-03 11:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > > Hi all, I'm trying to get pairs of two out of a

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 11:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Hi all, I'm trying to get pairs of two out of a list using two > [list split] (I tried to reproduce the patch with ASCII, but it's > getting a bit complicated, so I've attached it). how about using [

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread Cyrille Henry
hello, since externals can override internals, why not leaving hip~ untouched, and providing a corrected hip~ that is installed in pd/extra/0.44 one can just remove path > 0.43 it pd preference (or even using start-up flag) to have the old hip~, or keeping path untouched to have latest version

[PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
Hi all, I'm trying to get pairs of two out of a list using two [list split] (I tried to reproduce the patch with ASCII, but it's getting a bit complicated, so I've attached it). I'm sending a list [1 2 3 4( and I want to get 1 2 2 3 3 4 separately but I get an additional 4 4 in the end. Meaning, i