Hi Matt -
From Pd's perspective at least, it would be more efficient to handle the
messages separately (some of Pd's list operations have to copy the list,
which would be expensive if done iteratively over a long list).
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:37:05PM +0900, i go bananas wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to playback a sound file from the same array using multiple
[tabread4~] objects but I'm getting nasty clicks presumably because they
are having accessing the same array at the same time. Is there another
approach to this or some other way of avoiding the clicks?
thanks
James
There aren't any interactions between tabread4~ (etc.) objects reading
from the same table - I do it all the time - for example, the silly example
in 3.audio.examples/D13.addtive.qlst.pd
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:06:46PM +0100, James Dunn wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to playback a
Hi Simon,
Maybe it's just me but I did not find an attachment with your last post.
By the way I found a bug in my upsampling method: apparently,
[samplerate~] in a resampled subpatch needs some time before it
reports the correct samplerate, therefore the subpatch used wrong
values for filter
katja,
you can see the error as an amplitude fluctuation in the array (i think thats
the error) it gets more and more dominant with higher frequencies and at some
point you hear a deep note, which seems to be the amplitude modulation coming
into the hearable range.
or am i wrong? i also could
On 04/29/2014 10:44 PM, Jaime E Oliver wrote:
I guess one of the nicest things about what you're showing is to do
manipulations ala PWGL or open music. I'm interested in being able to make
arbitrarily complex and long scores, and be able to export these as lilypond
scores that can be edited
=
Call for Papers
Workshop on Practice-Based Research in New Interfaces for Musical Expression
NIME 2014 Workshop: Goldsmiths, London, UK www.nime2014.org
Workshop website: http://www.creativityandcognition.com/NIMEWorkshop/
Submission
