Mike McGonagle a écrit :
> On 5/1/07, Patco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Pagano, Patrick a écrit :
>> > Let me know when I can edit my TX81z with pd
>> >
>> >
>> In the manual of the synth there certainly is a table with all sysex
>> messages for controling it from an editor,
>> so you can allread
Pagano, Patrick a écrit :
> Let me know when I can edit my TX81z with pd
>
>
In the manual of the synth there certainly is a table with all sysex
messages for controling it from an editor,
so you can allready edit the TX81z with pd.
___
PD-list@iem.a
i think there are some freeware editors for windows
for the dx/tx series
do you know if it uses sysex mostly or does it use cc
numbers to control parameters?
all the best
adam
___
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't s
Let me know when I can edit my TX81z with pd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Malte Steiner
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:02 PM
To: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] "Universal" synth editor
I am still mad at Apple
I am still mad at Apple that they abandoned SoundDiver, I invested quite
some money in Emagic stuff for my studiorig and it is still working but
deadend now. This was one of the events which brought me to Linux and
opensource software in general. So go for the synth editor, I have the
same in m
you should totally do it, andy.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Nice one.
On the OP - I used to have an emagic program called
SoundDiver and another called X-OR back in the days when
I had stacks of modules. It would probably be easy enough
to get a copy and interrogate it (maybe looking at the code
for the plugins) to get ahold of all the system exclusive
nu
Thanks Kyle, I'm glad you liked it. :-) If you
construct a sound activated, jelly flinging catapult
then i'd be interested to take a look ;-)
If anyone else would like to publish this article then
please email me at this address.
/shameless plug
All the best
Adam
> Great article, Adam!
>
>
Great article, Adam!
I especially like the bit at the beginning:
"So if you yearn for an electromagnetic catapult that flings jelly at
the audience every time you rattle your tambourine, or a USB incense
burner which radiates progressively stronger smells as the temperature
in the church hall ri
--- Kyle Klipowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you ever post a link to your Pd article on the
> list? I'd very much
> like to read it!
here you are:
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/aug06/articles/puredata_0806.htm
this one includes a bit of a grammatical nasty in the
first sentence... (is
Did you ever post a link to your Pd article on the list? I'd very much
like to read it!
~Kyle
On 1/30/07, adam armfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 14:39 -0600, Mike McGonagle
wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone out there knows of a set
of abstractions
> that have been writ
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 14:39 -0600, Mike McGonagle
wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone out there knows of a set
of abstractions
> that have been written to use as a Synth Editor? I
currently own a
> Roland XV5050 and an old Yamaha TX7, and want to
write an editor for
> them.
>
I wrote a basic edit
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 14:39 -0600, Mike McGonagle wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone out there knows of a set of abstractions
> that have been written to use as a Synth Editor? I currently own a
> Roland XV5050 and an old Yamaha TX7, and want to write an editor for
> them.
>
I don't have anything
I was wondering if anyone out there knows of a set of abstractions
that have been written to use as a Synth Editor? I currently own a
Roland XV5050 and an old Yamaha TX7, and want to write an editor for
them.
Anyone have some code to share?
Thanks,
Mike
14 matches
Mail list logo
