Re: [PD] oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?

2013-10-26 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
On 10/26/2013 10:05 AM, Peter P. wrote: Hi! Pd 0.45.0 informs me at startup that "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?" while all seems to work normally. I also have this: cat /proc/asound/cards 0 [Intel ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel HDA Intel at 0xf822 irq

Re: [PD] oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?

2013-10-26 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 2013-10-26 16:05, Peter P. wrote: > Hi! Pd 0.45.0 informs me at startup that > > "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?" > > while all seems to work normally. I also have this: i have the same > > cat /proc/asound/cards > 0 [Intel ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel >

[PD] oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?

2013-10-26 Thread Peter P.
Hi! Pd 0.45.0 informs me at startup that "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?" while all seems to work normally. I also have this: cat /proc/asound/cards 0 [Intel ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel HDA Intel at 0xf822 irq 45 29 [ThinkPadEC ]: ThinkPad EC - Thin

Re: [PD] "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?"

2012-06-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-21 00:25, Julian Brooks wrote: > aptitude install puredata So now aptitude gets as far as 'Setting > up puredata (0.43.2-3)'. Then nothing from any of the 3 options > above... hmm, $ dpkg -L puredata-core | grep bin /usr/bin/puredata so i

Re: [PD] "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?"

2012-06-20 Thread Julian Brooks
please always reply to the list. > Yes, of course. Apologies you can't (unless you are willing to dig into the pd-sources) > Rather not atm > > just to make sure: "puredata-core" is also 0.43.2-3, innit? > Yip yip which means that you are not using the pd that debian provides for you, > but

Re: [PD] "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?"

2012-06-20 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
please always reply to the list. i have zero interest into fixing individual problems privately. On 06/20/2012 04:46 PM, Julian Brooks wrote: > Hey, > > Still wondering about this? > > >>> How do I fix the enumeration? >> you can't (unless you are willing to dig into the pd-sources) >> >> you

Re: [PD] "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?"

2012-06-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-20 15:38, Julian Brooks wrote: > Hi IOhannes, > > How do I fix the enumeration? > > 'apt-get install puredata' took out jack2 well, i can assure you that i have both "puredata" (0.43.2-2) and "jackd2" (1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-1)

Re: [PD] "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?"

2012-06-20 Thread Julian Brooks
Hi IOhannes, How do I fix the enumeration? 'apt-get install puredata' took out jack2 Maybe there's something else going on because I get 'signalling watchdog' and nothing else when attempting to start Pd. Same problem with jack. Cheers for advice tho', Julian _

Re: [PD] "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?"

2012-06-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-20 14:48, Julian Brooks wrote: > Hi all, > > oops: ALSA cards not reported in order? oops: ALSA cards not > reported in order? audio input devices: 1. HDA Intel (hardware) 2. > HDA Intel (plug-in) 3. Hammerfall DSP (hardware) 4. Hammerfall

[PD] "oops: ALSA cards not reported in order?"

2012-06-20 Thread Julian Brooks
Hi all, I have recently upgraded my system to Debian Sid (with some wheezy pinning) which is the post-puredyne/eighty-column newfangled method. See here for more info: http://eightycolumn.lurk.org/Category:Debian When I try to run my fresh new Pd install (0.43.2-3 from the debian unstable reposi