>
> From: "Pagano, Patrick"
>To: i go bananas ; Jonathan Wilkes
>Cc: PD List
>Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 11:46 AM
>Subject: RE: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
>
>
>
>jMax I want that year back.
I don'
jMax I want that year back.
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of i go
bananas
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:56 PM
To: Jonathan Wilkes
Cc: PD List
Subject: Re: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
>>If not, contacting
the handful of developers wh
>>If not, contacting
the handful of developers who have worked on expr might be a workable
solution.<<
that's what i HAVE done.
at the moment, it seems that we still need to contact IRCAM directly, but
we just need to wait for Shahrokh to identify which jMax code was used.
___
- Original Message -
> From: Marvin Humphrey
> To: Mathieu Bouchard
> Cc: Jonathan Wilkes ; PD List ; i go
> bananas
> Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
>
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 02:35:26PM -0500
Le 2011-12-03 à 14:06:00, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
There are all kinds of crazy people in the world who claim things they
don't have the right to, but to pursue the matter ad absurdum, any
lawsuit over a small typo is going to be thrown out for failing a de
minimis test.
Does that still cos
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 02:35:26PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> I don't think anyone claims copyright on correcting a small typo, for
> example.
There are all kinds of crazy people in the world who claim things they don't
have the right to, but to pursue the matter ad absurdum, any lawsuit o
Le 2011-12-03 à 12:07:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
Well, one can either contact everyone who has ever contributed to the
code and get an explicit "ok", or one can pay a lawyer to explain
whether what a non-lawyer wrote on a list back in sep-oct actually
matches up with the law.
Match up whi
- Original Message -
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> To: Jonathan Wilkes
> Cc: i go bananas ; PD List
> Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
>
> Le 2011-12-03 à 09:35:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
>
>>
Le 2011-12-03 à 09:35:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
(You also need to contact devs who added functionality and fixed any
bugs in the expr code.)
Those depend on whether those people agreed, explicitly or implicitly, to
give up their copyright.
I don't think anyone claims copyright on correc
>
> From: i go bananas
>To: PD List
>Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 11:55 AM
>Subject: [PD] [expr] license issue (update)
>
>
>just a quick update on the behind the scenes work i have been doing to see if
>we can get [expr] under
just a quick update on the behind the scenes work i have been doing to see
if we can get [expr] under the BSD license.
Firstly, i have been in contact on several occasions with Apple, in regards
to their position on LGPL software in their apps. They have really given
me the runaround, and even af
11 matches
Mail list logo
