Re: [PD] [multiCurveAdsr] v.2

2007-05-19 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote: It would be pretty easy to modify this to have a separate C (curve) parameter for attack and decay/release (or even separate C's for decay and release as well, if one were so inclined). Actually I believe that it's not that easy at all,

Re: [PD] [multiCurveAdsr] v.2

2007-05-19 Thread Phil Stone
You're right, Frank. I was just working on this, and as I wrote in a separate post, I gave up. You need independent [vline~]s, and matching up endpoints becomes extremely tricky. Phil Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote: It would be pretty easy

Re: [PD] [multiCurveAdsr] v.2

2007-05-19 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote: It would be pretty easy to modify this to have a separate C (curve) parameter for attack and decay/release (or even separate C's for decay and release as well, if one were so inclined). Actually I believe that

[PD] [multiCurveAdsr] v.2

2007-05-18 Thread Phil Stone
I found and fixed a condition that kept some sustain changes from being propagated. I cleaned other stuff up a little, too. (tweaked text from previous announcement:) I have been working on envelopes lately, and I have come up with something that I'd like to share. I started out with the

Re: [PD] [multiCurveAdsr] v.2

2007-05-18 Thread Phil Stone
Hi Roman, It would be pretty easy to modify this to have a separate C (curve) parameter for attack and decay/release (or even separate C's for decay and release as well, if one were so inclined). I considered doing this, but didn't do it for the selfish reason that my envelope UI's are