On Nov 20, 2007, at 3:21 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Is there any particular reason why [print] does not accept
float arguments? I think I want to add th
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> Is there any particular reason why [print] does not accept float
>>> arguments? I think I want to add them.
>> probably for a similar reason like why [send] does not
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I don't understand your point. Basically what I am asking is, would
> anyone object to adding the ability to handle float args to [print]?
No, I think this would be useful and I stumbled across [print] not
accepting n
On Nov 20, 2007 12:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand your point. Basically what I am asking is, would
> anyone object to adding the ability to handle float args to [print]?
Hans, I am not really sure exactly what you mean here. Is this something as
s
On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> Is there any particular reason why [print] does not accept float
>> arguments? I think I want to add them.
>
> probably for a similar reason like why [send] does not accept float
> arguments?
>
> (th
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why [print] does not accept float
> arguments? I think I want to add them.
probably for a similar reason like why [send] does not accept float
arguments?
(this is of course not true; [send] requires "binding" to a label, and
numb
Is there any particular reason why [print] does not accept float
arguments? I think I want to add them.
.hc
All information should be free. - the hacker ethic
___
