Re: [PD] [tabread4~] bug???

2012-07-24 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
On 24/07/12 12:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-24 09:34, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: This is a known limitation with [tabread4~] and [tabread~] and pops up every now and then [1] (it could probably be useful to mention it in [tabread~] help). i

Re: [PD] [tabread4~] bug???

2012-07-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-24 09:34, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > > This is a known limitation with [tabread4~] and [tabread~] and pops > up every now and then [1] (it could probably be useful to mention > it in [tabread~] help). it is mentioned in the help-patch for [ta

Re: [PD] [tabread4~] bug???

2012-07-24 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
Hi, On 24/07/12 03:55, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: Ok, as long as we're on it, here's another thing I found while patching around. Probably related to the last crazy behaviour I just described, but something on its own. It is simpler than phase vocoding, it's just something weird about sa

Re: [PD] [tabread4~] bug???

2012-07-24 Thread i go bananas
There is some inbuilt limit to array sizes that needs to be overridden by using the -maxsize tag when loading a file from soundfiler. I have a feeling it might mess things up with GOP arrays if you use that. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE an

[PD] [tabread4~] bug???

2012-07-23 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Ok, as long as we're on it, here's another thing I found while patching around. Probably related to the last crazy behaviour I just described, but something on its own. It is simpler than phase vocoding, it's just something weird about sampling into arrays and playing with [tabread4~]. Well, maybe