On 10/01/11 12:06, Jaime Oliver wrote:
the truth is: it depends on the purpose.
Nothing Truer...
Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey
camera is not slow.
for gesture, i consider everything under 200Hz as slow.
surely this is the case for percussion as in
On 09/01/11 02:14, Max wrote:
there is an interesting whitepaper on this topic:
http://www.palindrome.de/d2/C13.pdf
the entire palindrome.de website is really interesting, thanks for posting!
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
It's hard to say if this solution can work for me.
Maybe I should just buy a ps3 camera and try out.
they are cheap...
Do you think that the ps3 camera can correctly track a body moving
(using enough lighting)?
correctly depends on the kind of data you want to get form the movement...
On 11/01/11 22:51, Jaime Oliver wrote:
It's hard to say if this solution can work for me.
Maybe I should just buy a ps3 camera and try out.
they are cheap...
Do you think that the ps3 camera can correctly track a body moving
(using enough lighting)?
correctly
Hello all,
I'm new to this list... I've just started out with PD, with body-tracking in
mind actually.
I'm working with the kinect - you can get it working on your OS of choice,
via the wonderful community effort at:
http://openkinect.org/wiki/Main_Page
Seems like a natural fit for PD, and
Hi, As Cyrille says a good choice is the wii and its accelerometer,
you can even hack and reduce weight and dimensions, the three-axis
accelerometer or sensor flex not recommend to you, take away the
freedom to be wired.
I heard that the camera play 3 works very well for tracking, even I
could
We have been playing around with tracking and PD for several years.
Camera solutions are relatively slow and inaccurate if you're thinking
about human body motion like martial arts stuff etc. Apart from camera
issues, it's also very dependent on lighting the scene and how you can
mark or
Completely agree with you cyrille.
the truth is: it depends on the purpose.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:37 AM, cyrille henry c...@chnry.net wrote:
Le 08/01/2011 20:24, Pedro Lopes a écrit :
Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey camera is
not slow.
for
hello,
for the kung fu : movement are usually very fast. a camera is usually to slow
to be useful.
i personally prefer using sensor like accelerometter on the body.
you can use wiimote or some other (faster) sensors system.
here is a video of a performance i worked for few years ago.
On 07/01/11 23:14, Pedro Lopes wrote:
Body tracking depends on the hardware you have:
is kinect the best way? no. but its awesomely cheap and non intrusive.
Do you have 10k dollars to spend in a vicon (http://www.vicon.com/)
motion tracker? They kill kinect accuracy in an eye blink.
Is
On 08/01/11 01:07, Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote:
Hi, I think in my humble opinion is the worst kinekt ... interactivity
is not achieved suam reagent, the other day I saw the kids playing and
seemed automata, emotionless, worried - robotic, incredible.
I haven't tryied kinect yet, so I cannot
If you want 3d and really fast... mocap. But they cost a lot and you have to
wear the tiny capture reflective IR balls.
Kinect is good, but latency exists. Games and developers do all sorts of
filtering to simplify data and make it realtime usable.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:16 PM, marcello
On 08/01/11 14:25, cyrille henry wrote:
hello,
for the kung fu : movement are usually very fast. a camera is usually to
slow to be useful.
i personally prefer using sensor like accelerometter on the body.
you can use wiimote or some other (faster) sensors system.
here is a video of a
Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey camera is
not slow. you probably will have a lot of trouble in dealing with 60 frames
trying to cycle through your code every second. Accels and other hardware
sensors are very useful too, and it very good results. But not the best
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:21 PM, marcello wallacechemi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/01/11 14:25, cyrille henry wrote:
hello,
for the kung fu : movement are usually very fast. a camera is usually to
slow to be useful.
i personally prefer using sensor like accelerometter on the body.
you can use
Le 08/01/2011 20:21, marcello a écrit :
On 08/01/11 14:25, cyrille henry wrote:
hello,
for the kung fu : movement are usually very fast. a camera is usually to
slow to be useful.
i personally prefer using sensor like accelerometter on the body.
you can use wiimote or some other (faster)
Le 08/01/2011 20:24, Pedro Lopes a écrit :
Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey camera is not
slow.
for gesture, i consider everything under 200Hz as slow.
including the wiimote 100Hz.
by example, things like this have to be done at 1000Hz:
there is an interesting whitepaper on this topic:
http://www.palindrome.de/d2/C13.pdf
Am 09.01.2011 um 01:37 schrieb cyrille henry:
Le 08/01/2011 20:24, Pedro Lopes a écrit :
Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey camera is
not slow.
for gesture, i consider
Hi all,
I planning to do some video tracking in order to sonify some
performance: a dancer and a kung fu form.
I basically need to track different movements and connect them to some sounds.
I'm evaluating different technologies at the moment.
Kinect looks like the best way to track body
Hi, I think in my humble opinion is the worst kinekt ... interactivity
is not achieved suam reagent, the other day I saw the kids playing and
seemed automata, emotionless, worried - robotic, incredible.
I have consulted many times this same issue and there are several ways
to fix it, many
If yo can not solve i can help you
JOsé
2011/1/7 Jose Luis Santorcuato santorcuat...@gmail.com:
Hi, I think in my humble opinion is the worst kinekt ... interactivity
is not achieved suam reagent, the other day I saw the kids playing and
seemed automata, emotionless, worried - robotic,
21 matches
Mail list logo
